A strategy on how to deal with and a plan to get back at - SaintNow.
Let's do it.
Side Score: 15
|
 |
Just ignore him.
Side Score: 15
|
|
|
|
|
People have been doing this for a while already, and I appreciate it. I make my point in the OP, and when my debate is copied, the point is published twice as much as I worked for. I generally stay out of the copied debates and the juvenile delinquents who want to stomp my debates get bored with each other because they have nothing to talk about when I'm not there supporting the OP. Ya'll enjoy!! THANKS!!!!! I hope this helps!! S.N. Side: Let's do it.
1
point
I vote to boycott his debates. His problem is not just that he's a rabid Zealot but his theology and biblical interpretation just plain sucks. This is what happens alot with Literalists. They don't get enough of practice at interpreting the allegory and metaphor that was the language in many of the stories. Especially in the Torah. So they miss the bigger and more profound picture. The forest for the trees. And when I best Ain'tNow with my interpretations, he either attacks me and my church, or bans me. I would be more tolerant if his shaky theology but he drives people away from Christianity. Does far more harm than good to our cause of spreading the Word. Thus I would advocate a boycott of his debates. Which btw are not even debates but bully pulpit theological rants. God Bless Side: Let's do it.
|
Thanks, Pro. I'm pretty clear in what I want for the conversations. Some people just can't figure it out....focus on the OP, be careful about profanity, and you wont' get banned. I try to let things go from people who are commenting but not being disruptive....you do that sometimes, make an odd comment that's really harmless and I can see you are trying to be lighthearted in it. Look at Slap Shot.......when I first came on, he was the most obnoxious and annoying atheist but he won my respect by being an honest man, and I let him get away with some cursing in my debates because he earned that right by battling with me and showing me some respect. Hindu's and Buddhists are more rock headed than atheists. At least atheists try to stay down to earth. When you argue with a jester who thinks he is an expression of the divine and can do no evil, that's a horse of a different color. Even though they are basically the same, atheists are generally more reasonable than Hindus who think they are god or part of god or whatever their opiated brain makes them feel like. Side: Just ignore him.
2
points
1
point
Only fools copy other's debates! Are you a fool? Would you want people copying your debates because you were such an idiot to copy theirs? Here's a novel idea. IGNORE HIM if you don't like how he runs his debates. He has every right to ban you as do you have every right to ban him. It's called freedom! Why would you waste your time in someone's debate if they don't want to deabte with you? GET SOME PRIDE! Side: Let's do it.
2
points
Even Cartman can behave himself in my debates sometimes well enough to not get banned...until he head explodes and he really gets mad and disruptive and I have to ban him.....but I was surprised he did very well a couple times. You do ok sometimes and I appreciate it. People go off and on from my auto ban list depending on how much they annoyed me with profanity and closed minded arguments which cause deafness resulting in obnoxiousness. I would much rather be ignored than to have people come to my debates just to make trouble and obscure focus on the OP which I hope to get people going in for constructive conversation. The multi-personality creator of this debate IS on my auto ban list and will probably stay there for a while. Side: Just ignore him.
You're making this harder than it needs to be. If you want to respond to him and he hasn't already banned you just say your part but make sure it's complete enough to stand on its own even if he bans you. Done. It's that simple. And if indeed you were pre-banned by a debater then either ignore them or start your own debate on the subject so you can speak your mind. This doesn't take an orchestrated plan. Just speak where you get the chance to and if you lose the chance to continue in the middle either walk away or start your own separate debate. Personally I don't think his banning anyone convinces any other user on the site that he just won whatever the argument was. Don't worry. If he bans you mid debate I'll think no less of you nor consider you to be beaten. Side: Just ignore him.
I usually completely disagree with him, but, I will defend his right to his rights, just like I would defend yours. I wish he would refrain from name calling, deciding who will go to hell, etc., but if he insists on making enemies .... that is also his right. Problem is, HE wont give US the right to disagree with him ... not very Christian ... or American ... of him. Side: Just ignore him.
|
