I think that it is in the male genetic makeup. There must be some evolutionary purpose in it. I guess when it first developed it must have been a revolutionary new take on gender differences or something. Who knows ;)

If this isn't a Joe Cavalry debate then nothing is. You saw two women embracing with obviously something wrong and yet all you could focus on were two sets of breats pressing against each other as though it were something sexual. Are men dogs? You bet they are when they have that type of tunnel vision!

Rufffff rufffff ruffff rufff ruff, rufff ruff ruf ruf rufff.

Of coarse we are. I can't make it past a fire hydrant or a car tire without having to mark my territory.

men and woemn have differnt wants when it comes to sexual affirs: men want to impregnate as many women as possible, for as many offspring as possible, and women want to keep guys around to help raise their kids.

So, for the girls, guys are cheating sleezeballs who don't try to relate to you emotionally.

And, for the guys, girls are controlling bitches who care too much about what you do and all your shit and every girl you look at, after which they want to talk about their feelings and don't want to put out enough.