Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

8
4
True Wait..., what? No!
Debate Score:12
Arguments:10
Total Votes:13
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True (8)
 
 Wait..., what? No! (2)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40163) pic



Don't ban guns because we are going to need our guns for when the shooting starts

 

Gun control means two hands on the gun.

And remember....

No matter how excited you are about buying your first gun, do not run around yelling 'I have a gun! I have a gun!'

True

Side Score: 8
VS.

Wait..., what? No!

Side Score: 4

We need some way to keep the masses at bay ;)

Side: True
1 point

well, if that's the motivation why stop at guns use nukes

edit: lmao just saw the date stamp is 10 years ago. most belated quip ive ever made.

Side: True

You have to draw the line somewhere ;)

Side: True
1 point

Well, I think we will be okay... the Occupy Rome protesters are smashing windows and burning police vans.... ours are smoking pot and defecating in the streets.

A political "movement"
Side: True

If we legalize smoking pot, then they'll be too stoned to care about the 1% and I can support them from home. It's a win-win situation ;)

Side: True
1 point

when the zombies come you'll be sorry when you don't have a gun to kill the undead hordes coming at you !!!

Side: True
1 point

This is such a great post and was thinking much 1001 games the same myself. Be sure to keep writing more great articles like this one. Thank you for sharing. Please visit us for marketing assignment help.

Side: True
1 point

I also agree with your point but it should still be banned retro bowl for everyone to use guns.

Side: True
2 points

I do believe that banning guns would ultimately save more lives then having them legal.

Side: Wait..., what? No!
1 point

15 people died just yesterday from a school shooting, 14 of them were children. We don't need freaking guns to live. Look at Europe, they hold together just fine.

Side: Wait..., what? No!