Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

1
2
True. Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:3
Arguments:3
Total Votes:3
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True. (1)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (2)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40163) pic



Men who tie their wife/girlfriend up should consider a disabled woman instead


Men who are into bondage should consider a disabled woman.
For example:
A blind woman does not need a blindfold and you save money on blindfolds.
A mute woman does not need a ball gag and you save money on ball gags.
A quadriplegic or a woman who is paralyzed from the neck down does not need to be tied up and you save money on restraints like ropes, chains, locks and handcuffs.
Many of these women would enjoy a nice relationship with a man and many of them are just cast aside in preference for abled women.

True.

Side Score: 1
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 2

Personally, I don't understand this bondage thing. I mean, how is she going to make you a sandwich? ;)

Side: True.
1 point

Men who tie their wife/girlfriend up should consider a disabled woman instead

Hello joe:

It's true... The best piece of ass I ever had was from a spastic chick.. She could NOT stay still.. So, I tied her up, climbed on top, and yelled to my friend with the scissors, "cut her loose"..

excon

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

Bronco busting, I see ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!