I agree, although I have done it, without any proof or anything to back up your comment it is indeed not an argument. By just saying "No it doesn't" it is normally just classified as a view or opinion not an argument.
Despite public opinion here, "No it doesn't" does not carry any weight. One should make their case. The lack of anything but these words is simply proof that the other side is correct. God does exist.
In all seriousness though, you're really good at dragging your personal vendettas into pretty much every debate, whether or not they have any bearing on the issue at hand.
Anyway Joe, I'm not usually a fan of your more frivolous debates but I guess this one redeems itself with a Monty Python sketch. The first few minutes are a little like what I imagine CD would look like if it was a place.
Even if this debate were meant to facilitate a serious discussion, it doesn't have anything to do with religion or belief, yet you managed to cram into your short post the irrelevant assertion that nonbelievers are wrong and you are right.
PS: I don't know many people who have no vendettas and you clearly have a vendetta against atheists, evidenced by your constant petty attacks and generalizations.
You are right in the assertion that you are wrong, but so am I. I have no proof that God exist and you have no proof he doesn't. If you understood sarcasm, your post would be much better. I knew that someone would attack me and so I set the trap. A trap sprung by arrogance and by the lack of ability to let one have a belief other than yours. You accuse me of doing what you do, preaching. I posted God exist and you had to give me a sermon about it.
The reason I have no vendettas against others is that I am strong enough never to associate again with those that have wronged me.
A vendetta against atheist, oh yeah I have one of them. It is against all atheist everywhere and I plan to take them all down. I plan to do this right after I rule the world. Petty attacks and generalizations, what do you call what you do? Let me guess. You merely only set those straight by showing them substantiated facts and using critical thinking, because atheist are the only ones capable of doing so.
I started to type up a response then decided I'm not interested in arguing belief with you especially in a debate that doesn't even have anything to do with it. It's so obvious to me (and probably anyone else) that you have a personal grudge against atheists and that you try to bring it up whenever you can, but since you have somehow convinced yourself this isn't true, explaining my case is useless.
No it does not, if we simply count yeahs and nehs it is a vote and not an argument. Simply voting on an issue is an appeal to popularity and does not determine any facts.
"I started to type up a response then decided I'm not interested in arguing belief with you especially in a debate that doesn't even have anything to do with it. It's so obvious to me (and probably anyone else) that you have a personal grudge against atheists and that you try to bring it up whenever you can, but since you have somehow convinced yourself this isn't true, explaining my case is useless."
Oh how I love it when someone simply states "No it doesn't" and then runs away. You want proof, you got it.
