http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr26j99bOAE&feature=youtu.be

  Disclaimer:  You can't make this shit up. One of the nuns at the monastery, Anna Nobili, a former lap-dancer, reportedly took part in dance performances with other nuns during religious ceremonies. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13559219

  http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/12/opinion/la-oe-marzook-palestine-20110612 Mousa Abu Marzook is one of the founders of Hamas and its deputy political bureau chief. He was born in Gaza and lived in the United States for 14 years.... and he's NOT happy.

What is religion , do you understand that ?   All world's newspapers are writing about pedophilia scandals by catholic church .   If Uganda's anti-homosexuality bill becomes law, the chief executive of the country's main gay rights group could face life imprisonment. That is nothing new  just public opinion has never known the truth about church . Thanks to internet we can find out the truth.   What you think if priests really believe in God ? I do not think they believe in God by themselves or if they believe what is that religion actually and how is that ?      Catholic church is anti gay and for moral but the great majority of people think that priest are homosexuals .    They are just incredible many scandals coming from the church ( homosexuality , pedophilia , crime , corruption ,  pregnant nuns ) , protestant bishops  in Sweden are lesbians on the other side Catholic church is accused for mass  pedophilia . Do they believe in God and how is that actually ?    ========== What is religion and how did they created "thing"?   How do they create religion ? What are the scientific facts about religion ? “The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can change this for me.”   Einstein        ======= Hate Crimes and Religious Intolerance   Hate crimes are defined by federal law as criminal acts motived by an assailant’s prejudice against the victim’s religion, race, ethnicity, disability, gender, or sexual orientation.  The FBI reports that religious intolerance accounts for about 20% of hate crimes reported by law enforcement authorities across the nation.       ======= Schizophrenia In a study of patients with schizophrenia that had been previously admitted to a hospital, 24% had had religious delusions.[8] This has led some researchers to question whether schizophrenia leads an individual to become more religious, or if intense religiosity leads to schizophrenia.              ======= Exorcism crime by church , just one example   Exorcism in Romania ends in death   She was treated for schizophrenia, but when she relapsed, a monk and four nuns tried a different method: exorcism.        ======= No , they did not stopped that , they make a new thing and catholic church is making "thing"   But they do it now again and we can follow it . Really a huge thing for Catholic church , a new big place for pilgrimage  Međugorje scam .    Clear bluff and scam , could give evidence for how they created religion.  You can find their website and read all about it :   Something like this :   - it always starts with some uneducated people in some small village  - Virgin or Jesus speaks to them  - Virgin promises heaven or punishment with hell  - he makes deeply religions people scared - Virgin make a big promises , you can find it under (  Međugorje Virgin Mary 10 secrets) - church joining the game , collecting money - they make business on it  - Vatican see possibility to become big and join if it can make a profit on it  - The success , sell scam to uneducated und religious folk ( some people just need religion and they sell it to them )       Is religion something more than this? I have never seen more then this.     Is that not stupid to support religion just to give all free  to few dirty bustards ?    Or maybe you can see that some people find a trust in religion and maybe that is good , great percentage  hope to see again some person they loved again in heaven .     Do we have to support religion just because we can not tell to some person : " Sorry you are never going to see again your loved person again and death is just a end for everything ."  

http://digg.com/2014/americas-horniest-states The first thing to know is that horns and antlers are completely different things. For starters antlers are temporary, whereas, like herpes, horns are forever. Therefore it would have been scientifically inaccurate for us to include such antlered animals as deer, caribou and elk. As it turns out, there are only five horned animals native to the U.S. — bighorn sheep, Dall sheep, mountain goat, muskox, and bison — and they all reside in either Alaska or the West. It’s a scientific fact that any state east of Texas is not the least bit horny. Frankly we had no idea what to expect when we began our research. We assumed all states were equally horny, except perhaps Kansas or Nebraska. But we were blown away by the horny numbers, and we hope you were too. Now back to our study on the adverse effects of caulk blocking.

New York lawmakers rejected a bill Wednesday that would have made their state the sixth to allow gay marriage, stunning advocates who weathered a similar decision by Maine voters just last month. Gay marriage is legal in Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts and Vermont. A New Hampshire law takes effect Jan. 1. New York also doesn't allow civil unions, but has several laws, executive orders and court decisions that grant many of the rights to gays long enjoyed by married couples. "We have a road map for 2010," said Alan Van Capelle, executive director of the Empire Pride Agenda, a leading proponent of the bill. "We certainly know who are friends. We certainly go to bed tonight knowing more about where our support is, and that's a victory." But a fight in the election year next year might be more difficult. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hRfgezF0Cr4Z-4GqQaP9vio3k_gQD9CBEU4O4

Under the guise of protecting the rights of disabled people, a United Nations treaty (Treaty 112-7) which could seriously curtail Americans’ liberty has been submitted to the United States Senate for approval and ratification. According to a senate press release announcing bipartisan support of the treaty, The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities “will recognize the fundamental values of non-discrimination and equal access for persons with disabilities in all areas of life.” However, the treaty also removes the rights of parents of disabled children to make decisions for their children’s welfare and, if ratified, will place the United States’ government in subjection to United Nations regulations. In an action alert Michael Ferris, President of ParentalRights.org, points out that this treaty will not only apply international disability law to the United States – effectually removing any individual state controls of disability law – but will also give the UN authority “to determine the legitimacy and lawfulness of the United States budget” and to require that US funds be given to support disabilities programs in less wealthy nations. Moreover, in ratifying this treaty, our government will not only be handing state and local government rights to the UN, but they will also, in effect, allow the UN to dictate disability compliance to private businesses, organizations, and persons. In view of this and similar attempts to usurp the rights of parents to direct their children’s upbringing and education — most notably, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which would effectually remove the rights of all parents, not only of parents of disabled children — concerned Mississippians sought a constitutional ammendment as a permanant safeguard for the rights of parents. This spring Mississippi House Speaker Phillip Gunn introduced a bill requesting the US Congress to call a convention in order to add an ammendment to the US constitution to declare that parental liberty is a fundamental right. The bill died in committee before it could come to a vote; however, its message — that parental rights are important to at least some Mississippians — has set the stage, perhaps, for other efforts to protect parental liberties in our state.

  China is running out of Vagina http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjGW_4o0RWk&feature=related writeFlash({"src":"http://www.youtube.com/v/pjGW_4o0RWk&feature","width":"425","height":"350"}); Funny thing is that today I went to Youtube to see the "The Video Congress Does Not Want You To See"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G96TY5JsV-sBut instead, I watched "Hilarious Commerial!!"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dwR-F79MjU&feature=related

http://nation.time.com/2013/11/04/lax-shooting-renews-debate-about-armed-officers-in-u-s-airports/

WITHOUT PARENT CONSENT?!?!?! http://www.seattlepi.com/local/417276_abortion23.html Who do the children belong to; the parents or the state? Who is responsible for children; the parents or the state? Who would you expect to have the best interest of a child at heart; the parent or the state?

Here's your chance to let the media know your stance on God, as a nation. NBC is presently taking a poll on whether or not "In God We Trust" should remain on U.S. currency. Click below and vote. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10103521

There is no argument that the Founding Fathers did not want the Government to force people to follow one specific denomination of Christianity. Did they want no influence of religion at all on the Government? A complete seperation of Church and State? Or, Did they just not want the Government police authority to inforce religious practices? I am looking for documented proof of answer. Not just an opinion like "They were Christians, everybody knows that" or "They were all Deist". Give source of quotes or answers.

NBC is taking a poll on whether or not the motto "In God We Trust" should be removed from U.S. currency.Your choices are:Yes. It's a violation of the principle of separation of church and state.No. The motto has historical and patriotic significance and does nothing to establish a state religion.Don't tell me, tell them! Click on the link below and vote.

There are two parts to the gay marriage issue. 1. The love aspect 2. The benefits The love aspect can be resolved in different ways. Gays can: 1. Have their own ceremony with friends and relatives 2. Petition religions to change their stance on gay marriage 3. Start their own religion The benefits aspect can be resolved simply by petitioning the government to stop using the word marriage and substitute in its place the word civil union and allow any couple (of age of consent) to join in a civil union. In short, this issue shouldn't even be an issue because there are ways around the situation. If you don't want to go around the situation, then you're trying to force yourself in. If you are trying to force yourself in, then clearly, you are not wanted there.

The Palestinians say UN acceptance of their state will change the rules of engagement vis-a-vis peace talks with Israel, with the Jewish state being viewed as one UN member state occupying another. But world powers seeking to avoid a head-on confrontation at the Security Council are pushing the Palestinians to instead approach the General Assembly with a draft resolution calling for their status to be upgraded from "observer" to "non-member state". Upgrading their status to non-member state - the so-called "Vatican option" - could be one such compromise. It would allow the Palestinians to become a full member of UN agencies such as the World Health Organisation, the child welfare agency UNICEF and the UNESCO world heritage body. Palestinians take statehood bid to UN gate

2 Peter 3:8 "But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day."

It seems like gays are against the use of the term "civil union" as the legal definition of a gay union.  But I don't understand how the term minimizes gay unions.

Non-violence cannot tackle terrorism: Dalai Lama The Dalai Lama, a lifelong champion of non-violence candidly stated that terrorism cannot be tackled by applying the principle of ahimsa because the minds of terrorists are closed. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nonviolence-cannot-tackle-terrorism-dalai-l.../411980/   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahimsa

What do I mean, "biblical"?I mean Old Testament, real wrath of God type stuff.Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...The dead rising from the grave!The end of gay marriage, abortions, Obama Care and of the world itself!Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!

The followers of atheism have historically made war. They swallow up the worlds resources making war weaponry. This lack of religion has a pattern of bringing the whole planet to the brink of a nuclear disaster which could wipe out most of the human race. This lack of religion seeks the approval of science.  This lack of religion uses race baiting and scientific hypocracy to fuel hatred throughout the earth....  So I ask the question...for the good of all peaceful people on planet  and the survival of the human race: should they be a continent and be forced to live there and thus be separated from the rest of the human race?