ChadOnSunday's Waterfall
Yay for synonyms!
Oral sex is also oral sex
Anal sex is also anal sex
Sex is also sex
And "intercourse" is:
1: connection or dealings between persons or groups
2: exchange especially of thoughts or feelings : communion
3: physical sexual contact between individuals that involves the genitalia of at least one person ; especially : sexual intercourse 1
So if "consummation" requires "intercourse," and "intercourse" includes any kind of sex involving the junk, one can use oral or anal sex to consummate a marriage.
The definitions are very clear. Pity there's so many of them, and they so often contradict one another.
I did look at MW and apparently you are just making this shit up:
1: connection or dealings between persons or groups
2: exchange especially of thoughts or feelings : communion
3: physical sexual contact between individuals that involves the genitalia of at least one person ; especially : sexual intercourse 1
So not only does "intercourse" have different meaning than the sexual one, but the sexual one specifically references oral and anal sex and being a type of intercourse.
Nice try, joe.
Intercourse
Sexual intercourse
Sex
Anal sex
Oral sex
Vag on vag sex
It doesn't seem like it's really a very complicated connection to make.
Anyways, mainly I just wanted to say I don't think you'd be bringing this issue up if some war vet paralyzed from the waist down (including his penis) got married after his tour.
Haha actually what am I saying... you of all people just might do that.
I stop participating in debates when it becomes evident it is no longer about anything other than getting the last word in. I've been there done that with you before, joe.
Because he's too busy trying to turn this site into a reddit/uberhumor hybrid.
Hahaha just kidding. Well no he is actually trying to do that, but he does also occasionally engage in serious debate. Occasionally. We just got into it in a real debate over gay marriage.
Haha I should've known all I had to do was include more women and less "offensive" comparisons to the black civil rights movement to get my point through to you.
Despite your assertions about the point of language being to cut down on ambiguity we don't really use it at all like that in situations like these, and like the example she gave. And in the "offensive" examples I gave.
I understand the confusion. When people say they are pro choice, they mean they like the ability to make choices and keep making choices. Despite how it sounds, pro-choice actually refers to more than one choice; ultimately the ability to choose to run your sex life however you choose. I could see how anti-choice advocates may think pro-choicers may just make their one choice in life and then be content to let the government make all subsequent choices for them - but I'll be damned they just keep wanting to make their own decisions.
I buy it when I see his third arm or at very least see him glow in the dark.
The study doesn't say who is shooting all these black people, so we can't ban any particular race for that reason. For all you know it's the Hispanics and Asians shooting all the blacks.
And suicide should be legal. You should be allowed to end your life. And you should be able to end your life how you want to, within reason. But frankly shooting yourself at home is much cleaner for society than, say, jumping off a tall building.... splat! So I don't think we should ban guns because one particular race or another is frequently killing themselves with guns. Because in addition to suicide being permissible, it's also not like shooting yourself is the only way to end your life. People will find other ways if they are committed to killing themselves.
Conservatives usually can't even tell when they themselves are gay. The Bible Belt, for example, is bursting with repressed homosexuality. What makes you think they would be good at detecting it in others?
