Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Excon's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Excon's arguments, looking across every debate.
excon(18261) Clarified
1 point

Show me just one solitary person on this entire website, who does not think that you are a retard.

Hello hater:

Well, there's your Jew hating ass, and 25 of your alts..

Whether I'm a Jew or not isn't up for a vote. It matters not who you line up on your side. I'll concede that you're not the only Jew hater around here.

Here's something to consider, "First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."

You're a socialist, aren't you? They're gonna come for you FIRST.

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha..

excon

excon(18261) Clarified
0 points

Just because PEOPLE think

Hello ANOTHER ALT:

People?? PEOPLE??? PEOPLE????

There ain't no people.. There's your Jew hating ass, and your 25 ALT'S..

Fuck you, Jew hater.

excon

excon(18261) Clarified
0 points

Excon would have been telling everybody who cared to listen that he was an 8th generation Germanic Catholic.

Hello hater:

Obsess much??

Dude!

excon

0 points

Remember when being woke just meant you had your cup of coffee

Hello:

I dunno WHY right wingers are SOOO interested in peoples genitals. You think they need your APPROVAL before they bonk somebody..

Dude! Get your mind out of the gutter.

excon

1 point

Just like his brother, Rittenhouse is a good kid. He helps out in the hallways

Hello C:

Really?? Just how many people do you need to kill to be a bad kid??

Dude!

excon

1 point

The awards ceremony..

Hello:

We got TWO rights going on here. Chris Rocks free speech rights, and Will Smiths right to be offended, and respond..

In my view, you're FREE to offend people, and if you do, they're FREE to strike back.. While it's true, that sticks and stones will break my bones, but OFFEND me at your own risk. Should I be more restrained?? Yes. Of course, I should. Nonetheless, OFFEND me at your peril.

Plus, I don't buy that offending people in the context of an act, are OK. To me, they are just as offensive and just as worthy of a response..

excon

PS: Yes, I got more to say.. I'm OFFENDED on this website every day. But, I promise you, should I meet that person on the street, one on one, he would NOT offend me. The reasons why are obvious..

1 point

We should change the definition of the N-Word to something that is not offensive to anyone

Hello joe:

Cool.. How about bongo? Opp, been taken. Ok, how about jigaboo? Nope, darn it.. Darkie?? Spade? Nahh. Used.. I'm sure there are others. Glad I don't know what they are.

Seems to me, changing a word that's universally used, is much harder than changing the behavior of a few. But, that's just me.

excon

-2 points
1 point

Abortion is not a constitutional right. The right to bear arms is a constitutional right

Hello joe:

Nahhh... You're confusing a right in the Bill of Rights, with a right that resulted from a court decision..

Look.. Miranda is NOT mentioned in the Constitution... Yet, it's a right, just as powerful and as strong as ANY Constitutional right..

Or, do you think there's a hierarchy of rights, where some rights carry more weight than other rights?? Dude! A RIGHT is like being pregnant.. You have it, or you don't. There are no gradations of rights.

You're not saying are you, that the ONLY rights we have are those in the Bill of Rights, and the ONLY way to get a new right, like abortion, is to amend the Constitution??? I think you ARE saying that. But, that ain't how it works.

excon

1 point

How is it that no one is arguing about the supreme court ruling on Texan abortion law

Hello Joe:

Ok, you wanted something, I'll give you something..

With this ruling,"the Constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery.”

I didn't say that.. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court said that. Truly, the Texas abortion law was designed so that it would never have to go under judicial review.. And, 6 members of the Supreme Court agreed with it, thereby making their jobs irrelevant.

The Chief Justice goes on, "the clear purpose and actual effect of S. B. 8 has been to nullify this Court’s rulings. It is, however, a basic principle that the Constitution is the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Indeed, if the legislatures of the several states may, at will, annul the judgments of the courts of the United States, and destroy the rights acquired under those judgments, the constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery. It's the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system that is at stake."

That's why states can now outlaw guns using this very same vigilante system of governance, instead of the courts..

How's that???

excon

1 point

How is it that no one is arguing about the supreme court ruling on Texan abortion laws?

Hello joe:

Look.. I'm fine with it.. My state is going to pass a law designed after the Texas law, that outlaws guns... If abortion is not a Constitutional right, then gun ownership isn't either..

excon

1 point

I am asking if they sent the statues to museums or if they just destroyed them ;)

Hello again, joe:

If I ran things, they'd be put in museums. But, I don't run shit.

excon

1 point

Oh..., where they relegated to museums ;)

Hello joe:

I dunno what the hell you said, joe.. Wanna try again?

excon

1 point

how can a country that just a little over 200 years old have ANY history?" Especially when they go around tearing down parts of it ;)

Hello joe:

From my perspective, civil war generals were traitors, who fought a war against America to maintain slavery, and LOST.. That's NOT a history I'd be proud of - unless, of course, you think the wrong side won the civil war..

Nonetheless, statues of these traitors are part of our history, and should be relegated to museums, where history is venerated, and out of the public square where hero's are venerated..

I don't think that's too hard to grasp, do you? ;]

excon

1 point

Do we still need the word - Transgender?

Hello joe:

Nahhh. There's a LOT of words right wingers would rather not know. But, once you know them, you'll ALWAYS know them..

UNLESS you go through the Trump cult initiation procedure.. It requires a TOTAL cleansing of words you simply don't like, and a re-write of recent history. Then and only THEN you can ignore words, and events that actually HAPPENED

Yeah... Throwing OUT words is waaay better than learning NEW ones. That makes us reel smart.

excon

1 point

A more realistic proposal would be to kill them all and let God sort them out. That's His job.

Hello again, joe:

Well, there ya go.. Kill everybody, and THEN check with God. That way, if you fucked up, there won't be anybody around to tell you about it.

excon

1 point

I still don't get it. ;)

Hello again, joe:

Yeah.. I know.

Later dude!

excon

1 point

I don't even know what discussion we are having.

I'm not letting trans people "live?" How exactly am I doing that? I did not know I had so much power ;)

Hello again, joe:

It's true.. The debate DISAPPEARS down a rabbit hole when one side can't read or understand English. It devolves into a you said this, and a no I didn't, kinda debate.

Only what we write stays written..

If you look at what I wrote, you'll see that I used the word live accompanied by the descriptive phrase "in this context," specifically so that you wouldn't get confused by my use of it.

Didn't work, huh?

excon

1 point

What exactly have conservatives done to change their view of "live and let live?"

I hope that question doesn't constitute me going all wonky on you ;)

Hello joe:

Uhh yes you did, joe. All wonky, indeed..

If "live and let live" were still the watchword of the Republican party, we wouldn't even be having this discussion.. Look no further than yourself. It's YOU, a right winger, who's NOT letting trans people "live" in this context, but making fun of them..

If we were still in the "live and let live" world, you wouldn't be doing that.. As opposed as you might be to trans people, like your watchword says, you'd "live" with it. "Living with it" is FREEDOM exemplified. It USED to be your position.. It's what I admired about you.. Not any more..

excon

1 point

People who are a burden to society should be shot - it is the humane thing to do.

Hello joe:

Hey. That's a really good idea. Let's start with the Joos. Certainly, they've been a burden since the get go. When we run outta them, let's murder black people.. Bongo boy would LOVE that. Then let's do the libs.. When they're gone, let's kill your neighbor.. He's a burdensome SOB anyway..

excon

1 point

A platypus swims up to a flock of waddling ducks...

Hello joe:

ONE of the things I admired most about conservatives was their view "to live and let live".. But, that disappeared when gay and trans people wanted to "live and let live"..

If I wanted to "identify" as a chicken, who's fucking business is that???

Now, don't go all wonky on me. Because I identify as a chicken, does NOT mean that you should too.. In other words, my identifying as a chicken does NOT require anything of you, except to mind your own business.. I certainly don't wanna KNOW what you identify as in your bedroom

excon

1 point

Such over-indulgence stifles the child's character

Hello A:

So, children should be DEPRIVED, huh? And that'll build character??

Nahh.. That'll breed hate.. But, you are giving us glimpses into why you're such a hateful human being.. You've NEVER had a toy truck!

Dude!

excon

1 point

LoL. This site wants people to stir the pot and get people riled up. I try to do that and stay out of the fray ;)

Hello joe:

Yeah.. In some circles, you'd be called a bomb thrower. But, I'm cool with that. Throw your bomb and step out of the way.. I'll take it from there.

excon

1 point

Like I said, I'm not taking a hard stance one way or the other. I'm more concerned about rush-hour traffic ;)

Hello joe:

I dunno, Dude.. Looks like you had quite a bit to say about it above.. Wassa matter? Did your wife look over your shoulder?

excon


1 of 10 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]