Phoot.

But I have more money than you, so....

Are you sure?

You listen to Wilco? What an old fart. Phoot.

You: Good thing that Ive been talking about more than just a mistake. You mighte'ev had a good point.

Me: Being stupid leads to mistakes. This is the implied relationship.

This implies that my claim of mistakes being valuable experience relates to your original comment: ""Adults" are just older children who have more confidence with displaying how stupid they really are. So who's gonna control the children?"

Need more head people in the world.

I think the head vs heart dilemma also depends on the situation. People get emotional over different things.

So, your point to substantiate the point is the point.

It seems implied by this statement.

Neither. Many contracts include a clause that destroys the embryos upon divorce.

If there is no such clause then one of the plaintiffs must show some exceptional reason. If the court/arbitrator/whatever deems it exceptional, that plaintiff will receive the embryos.

For example, if the man or woman freezes the embryos in preparation for a medical procedure that will cause infertility, then they will usually gain ownership.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/san-francisco-couple-bitter-divorce-battle-over-frozen-embryos-n393126

Since this was a communication between two individuals, you would have show that your transmission was clear in order to infer that I misinterpreted it.

I already pointed out the different between "point" and "summation". Your ball.

Who does not want to see a cat's butt hole?

The people on that <--- side, that's who.

From what I can tell, strict gun legislation alone will only prevent mass murders, not violent crimes. (At least until someone comes up with a better mass-murder weapon.)

making us all endure the bull shit.

I always took you for a coprophile.

A form of love? Not all sex can be declared in the name of love.

Well, we were talking about consensual sex earlier. I figured that would be extended to my previous comment as well.

I am not familiar with the Bible, but I do not recall anything about sex with God = defile.

Oh. I guess your question was asking for a summation of my comments thus far and not for the point/purpose of my comments. I guess unclear questions would cause confusion...

Or maybe the ultimate form of intimacy.

In the end, it is still a form of love. If humans are suppose to love God, what is wrong with that form of love?

From what I understand, sexual relations between consenting adults is the ultimate (?) form of love.

jolie: What America needs is child control.

I think he is just an extreme narcissist. He creates all men in his image and loves them all unconditionally.

Guess someone here does not want to earn their badge for note-taking.

Nah. Pedophilia is a defined relationship between humans. God can't be a pedophile if he can't age.

God's plan involves taking his children to Heaven to dwell in Heaven forever. Sexual relation with God is something that completely defiles his nature. God's nature doesn't change as he is most pure.

What is wrong with sexual relations?

The Bible allows for sexual relations between man and woman. Man was created in the image of God, wouldn't sexual relations be a good way for a woman to become intimate with God?

Which GW study? There have been many.

I have personally only reviewed a few, not familiar with most.

Or is Halloween just a holiday for people who can't appreciate Comic-con?

Both sides have agendas. Scientific conclusions should be evaluated without agendas which is what I am doing regarding this sunspot study.

Being stupid leads to mistakes. This is the implied relationship.

You are right. I cannot prove that there is value in most interactions. I am making the claim based on my assumptions.