If marriage did not exist - would you invent it?
Yes.
Side Score: 2
|
 |
Hell, no!!!
Side Score: 10
|
|
|
|
|
2
points
@Mingipoopoo There is nothing valid about taxes, or any other socially constructed anusol shit predicated on brainwashing and superstition. Marriage is just a product of the artificial guidance mechanisms that steer the sheeple into the confines of "normal" behaviour. Here is a translation of what you said: If a social construct wasn't conceptually binding in the human mind according to arbitrary man made rules and helped with government shakedowns and will arrangements upon death, there'd be nothing making it more valid than a non-arbitrary social construct relationship and social construct ceremonies would be rendered moot. Side: Hell, no!!!
The social conditions which existed when the original legally binding terms of marriage were established bears no relationship to today's society. Women's rights, gender equality, anti-sexual discrimination in the workplace and feminism all go to make the existing legal requirements included in the contract of marriage to be long since outdated. Even though we don't hear the feminist brigade demanding equality in the female biased legalities of marriage I still feel this institution should be retained. Side: Yes.
|
Marriage should not be a legal institution. That's the argument we should be having. ;)
Supporting Evidence:
http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/
Side: Hell, no!!!
1
point
Have you lost it ...how can some dare even to raise such a topic..i mean after banning drugs cocaine etc things ..marriage is the big issue that might be stopped ...the emotional reality of marriage is indispensably important...but as a matter of self dependance ...the freedom does overrule ..that feeling of living together...hearts being connected and trust are more than enough to enjoy life honestly .... ADIL SHAH BADEGHAR Side: Hell, no!!!
|
