It's impossible to believe something without sufficient evidence.
true
Side Score: 1
|
false
Side Score: 5
|
|
|
|
1
point
If this were the case, belief wouldn't be very diverse at all... or at the very least, what is true and false would be subjective. Who is more supported by evidence? scientists in biology, or creation scientists? What if you and me are both looking at a pink elephant, and you say the pink elephant doesn't exist, and I say it does, who is more supported by evidence? Side: false
1
point
1
point
Clearly. A child who's brain has not yet matured enough to have strong or even existent critical thinking skills will accept anything it's told on the spot with no evidence required. This is how religion survives. It feeds on the kids who are unable to mentally circumvent its traps Side: false
|