Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

1
5
true false
Debate Score:6
Arguments:6
Total Votes:6
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 true (1)
 
 false (5)

Debate Creator

atypican(4875) pic



It's impossible to believe something without sufficient evidence.

true

Side Score: 1
VS.

false

Side Score: 5
1 point

Believing in something without any evidence is simply wishing that it exists...

Side: true
DrawFour(2662) Disputed
1 point

I don't think child Christians would wish for Hell to exist.

Side: false

If this were the case, belief wouldn't be very diverse at all... or at the very least, what is true and false would be subjective. Who is more supported by evidence? scientists in biology, or creation scientists? What if you and me are both looking at a pink elephant, and you say the pink elephant doesn't exist, and I say it does, who is more supported by evidence?

Side: false

granted, evidence by itself doesn't support anything, until you apply logic to it, until you explain how the evidence supports you. But belief can still be on sufficient evidence, it just needs to be on sufficient logic as well.

Side: false

Clearly. A child who's brain has not yet matured enough to have strong or even existent critical thinking skills will accept anything it's told on the spot with no evidence required. This is how religion survives. It feeds on the kids who are unable to mentally circumvent its traps

Side: false
1 point

Ask Srom, belief seems to be pretty easy to come by with absolutely no evidence necessary at all. hell, in some cases people can still believe one thing, despite evidence against it.

Side: false