Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

Debate Score:4
Arguments:4
Total Votes:4
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
  (4)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40163) pic



People who believe that we can use non-violence to destroy terrorism have a 12th

People who believe that we can use non-violence to destroy terrorism have a 12th grade language grade level, they use a lot of long words to get their point across but.... people, still, would rather shoot them and get it over with ;)

But hey..., don't take my word for it:

http://www.createdebate.com/debate/stats/Can_we_use_Non_Violence_to_destroy_terrorism

Add New Argument

What can I say? I guess...., people are into instant gratification ;)

Now go out there and play nice. Don't make me kill you ;)

1 point

I love how much you pissed off Gary and then, in the end, he told someone "i'm not angry". lol, the tool.

And then Xaeon says "I haven't chosen a side" but, for some reason, is against Israel. If you are against someone, you have chosen a side.

I, on the other hand, have not chosen a side, so I believe that America shall help neither Israel nor Palestine. It is THEIR fight, not ours.

Terrorists use violence. We can't just take it up the ass and hope to develop a fool-proof strategy that will make everyone convert without having to raise a gun.

In the real world, we are going to have to kill some people. I am against war and believe we could have done way better with special ops, but unfortunately, we're at war and people have to deal with it.

But "non-violence" is fuckin' retarded at this point. Bring our troops home and send in spec ops, but that will still require some violence.

The only reasonable argument is that, yes, America fucked up in the past when it was trying to be all moral authority and shit, and helping establish the state of Israel. But that is, in no way, a good argument for what we need to do RIGHT FUCKIN' NOW about terrorism.

fuckin' morons.

I find myself reaching more for the insults lately. Probably because I'm losing faith in some debators.

Side: Dumb People

I tried re-reading some of that stuff. My God...., it goes on forever ;)

Side: Dumb People
atypican(4875) Disputed
1 point

Terrorists use violence.

No one but terrorists. So unless we want to be no better than terrorists, we'll have to come up with non-violent solutions.

I am against war and believe we could have done way better with special ops

But your brilliant mind somehow misses the correlation between a decrease in violence and a strategy that yields better results. With effort you might become a little less retarded.

The most retarded people (and one might wonder, "are you in that group?")are the one's who aren't bright enough to realize that the cycle of violence begetting violence cannot be broken with more of the same. We are going to have to come up with non-violent ways to respond to terrorism, because our current approach is as stupid as trying to put out a fire with gasoline.

Moron! :)

Side: Dumb People