Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

3
2
Sure, why not? You're so retardant.
Debate Score:5
Arguments:5
Total Votes:5
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Sure, why not? (3)
 
 You're so retardant. (2)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40163) pic



Should we start using the word RETARDANT as a stand in for the word we can no longer use?

A retardant by any other name is still a retardant.

Sure, why not?

Side Score: 3
VS.

You're so retardant.

Side Score: 2
joecavalry(40163)
1 point

We can use it to describe those retardants that inhibit the spread of wild ideas ;)

Side: Sure, why not?
Support Dispute Clarify
joecavalry(40163)
1 point

Instead of calling someone a pissant, call them retardant ;)

Side: Sure, why not?
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
joecavalry(40163)
1 point

Or you can just call them a retardant pissant ;)

Side: Sure, why not?
Support Dispute Clarify
Holy_Wars(-1)
1 point

The problem I have always found is that retardants are free to call other people retardants. It makes reality quite confusing for the innocent bystander.

Side: You're so retardant.
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
joecavalry(40163)
1 point

Yes, the whole issue is retardant ;)

Side: You're so retardant.
Support Dispute Clarify

Browse More Debates