Return to CreateDebate.comJoin this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

21
20
True. You sick bastard!
Debate Score:41
Arguments:25
Total Votes:62
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True. (12)
 
 You sick bastard! (12)

Debate Creator

jolie(9802) pic



What is the most logical progression of events if school shootings continue unab

if school shootings continue unabated
kids will eventually evolve the capability to
dodge bullets like Neo in the Matrix.


True.

Side Score: 21
VS.

You sick bastard!

Side Score: 20
1 point

Countries will think twice about going to war against us ;)

Side: True.
jolie(9802) Clarified
1 point

It's a win-win situation ;)

Side: True.

Or we could evolve bullet proof skin?

Eh, maybe dodging bullets is better.

Side: True.
1 point

Way cooler ;)

Side: True.
1 point

What is the most logical progression of events if school shootings continue unabated

Logically, we should be addressing the roots of the issue--typically social exclusion, isolation, ostracization, bullying, failure of Community networking/support system (which is overwhelmingly non-existent), less avenues available for the target to address bullies, ect. ect. All of this builds an enormous amount of resentment, hatred, rage, powerlessness, mental instability, ect. which leads the person over the brink and expresses their pain in completely unacceptable ways.

Side: True.
NumberOne(447) Disputed
2 points

Logically, we should be addressing the roots of the issue--typically social exclusion, isolation, ostracization, bullying, failure of Community networking/support system (which is overwhelmingly non-existent), less avenues available for the target to address bullies, ect. ect.

Logically, the root of the issue is none of the things you listed. The root of the issue is arming people with guns.

I have to add that it is simply bizarre to watch Americans blame shootings on literally everything except guns. It is an astonishing sight to behold you guys circumventing basic common sense every time there's another bloodbath.

It couldn't be simpler, MathFan. Stop giving people guns and people stop getting shot.

Side: You sick bastard!
1 point

I have to add that it is simply bizarre to watch Americans blame shootings on literally everything except guns

I am astonished that the British don't blame paintings on brushes. God you're a dumbass.

Side: True.
xMathFanx(1537) Disputed
-1 points

@NumberOne

Again, that still does not address the roots of the issue--simply one way that the accompanying problems manifest

Side: True.
xMathFanx(1537) Disputed
-2 points

In 2015, 10,265 people died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (29%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.

So you tell me with each child dying from a drunk driver, why the Left is not all over the media pretending to be outraged over these innocent children's deaths? Do you have any idea how many more children are killed by drunk drivers than by guns in schools?

Where is the outrage and demand for alcohol regulations and back ground checks in public bars, nightclubs, etc.

If the real reasons for more gun control legislation is to save lives, why won't the Left propose laws mandating back ground checks in public places that sell alcohol to possible repeat DWI offenders?

I don't want this, but if your goal is to save lives with all your anti Gun rhetoric, you should be over joyed to save many thousands more lives by having background checks on people before buying alcohol in public places.

Do you have any idea how many times repeat DWI drivers continue to drink and drive? Approximately 40% of drunk drivers are repeat offenders! They drive even when their licenses are revoked!

The only way to prevent this is to do a background check before they buy that weapon of death.....ALCOHOL!

Wait, what you say? You say you don't want to be inconvenienced by background checks when buying alcohol? You say you are a law abiding citizen who would never drink and drive?

You say you don't want to pay more for alcohol to pay for those background checks for past DWI drivers?

I THOUGHT YOUR GOAL WAS TO SAVE LIVES? You expect law abiding citizens to pay more and put up with all the inconvenience from your anti gun legislation, but when it comes to your alcohol...... HANDS OFF?

A drunk driver behind the wheels of a car happens millions of times more often than some lunatic with a gun! The odds of you or your loved one being killed by a drunk driver is far higher than the odds of being shot at a concert or Church.

You are hypocrites and total jokes. You prove you could not care less about saving lives. You final goal is to take our guns.

You always spew your ludicrous reasoning why only guns should be singled out to save lives. A police state is just fine as long as it only controls one particular weapon of death..... the gun.

You say we already have alcohol restrictions? Yes, and we already have gun restrictions. You can't buy a gun under age, the same as alcohol. We can't shoot people, you can't hunt near public places and you can not drink and drive. BUT PEOPLE STILL DO IT!

IT'S NOT THE WEAPON OF CHOICE, BUT THE PERSON BEHIND THAT WEAPON. Use the brain God gave you and start addressing why people grow up to be criminals, or become irresponsible drinkers who have no problem drinking and driving.

Start addressing the core problem instead of their weapon of choice.

Side: True.
1 point

I have said it before and I will say it again:

We abosolutely need more lucid politicians like Jolie running the world, things would be so much better, she is like a super AI: capable of learning from everything, just look at the brilliant idea that has just sparked in her while watching the Matrix

I wonder what wondrous ideas might spawn in her mind while watching Disney movies

Side: You sick bastard!