Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 318 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 95% |
Arguments: | 248 |
Debates: | 25 |
No. They recognise the error and fix it in themselves. Buddhism is more about watching the other and quietly scoffing at their idiocy (unless you care about them, then try to preach and help) rather than the monotheist religions which choose to preach and shove things down one's throat.
Shaolin monks are in fact the very opposite form of monk to a Buddhist monk; they seek physical fulfilment only and are of course very amazing at what they do but very emotionally unfulfilled and I feel extremely sorry for the children of such an oppressive cult (if you knew the harsh training they are put through from the day they are born it would horrify you).
The Buddhist is the only religious group to not seek ascension but rather infinite descension until the entire ego has left the body for good while still maintaining the urge to be enlightened and 'above' others at all times in a funny way. This is the cycle of Karmic energy.
You are spot on with your distinction. The Mahayana are hopelessly faithful in the good-will of others. the Theravada realise that us Buddhists are an elite form of soul.
Many have been incorrectly raised and hence have ended up having incorrect beliefs in life.
Buddhism, in the eyes of a Theravada such as myself, isnot about caring about the man dying next to you. Rather it is to help him merely out of the realisation that to not do so would be a very irrational thing indeed.
|