- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).|
Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
I think Im going to go with the theist side here. Of course I wont make it a very serious debate, because im sure Joe here is going to troll me off again :)
But here's my point, You're saying that religion was invented to troll atheists. So im assuming that you believe that there is a thing called religion(God). For atheists, who dont believe in God, i was just wondering, how could you say that something doesnt exist. First and foremost, for you to say that something doesnt exist, then there must be a thing that exists primary to that. You cannot justify that something isnt there without the approval that there is really that something.