Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 206 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 81% |
Arguments: | 518 |
Debates: | 19 |
This is a great litmus-test type question, because narrow-minded ideologues (Republican or Democrat) would never be able to answer it.
Really, as long as he doesn't screw up the country as much as Bush, he will have succeeded in my book. This means, 1) fund science, 2) improve our international image, 3) get us out of endless wars, 4) improve the economy.
If he stops or fails to do any one of those things, I'd probably stop liking him. I'll give him some leeway to accommodate for obstructionist Republicans who'd rather see the US in flames then Obama succeed at anything.
I know I don't insult people on this website and actually look down on it, but you are probably one of the biggest morons on this site.
Yeah, how dare I assume you're religious just because you support religious phrases on our currency.
Stay classy asshole.
Simply because something is part of our past doesn't mean it should be commeroated on our currency. I also fail to see how belief in God helped us beat the Communists.
Oh, and what's the ETA on God helping us beat the Chinese, who are also still sorta communist?
|