Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day



Welcome to Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day!

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS JustinaGarc

Reward Points:4
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
80%
Arguments:4
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
4 most recent arguments.
1 point

It would not make the war longer because that's what we are trying to prevent, but because Japan was thinking about surrendering it makes are job only easier and instead of looking like we cant stand up for what they've done to us and trying to make, "peace" and let it happen on our own, instead we need to use both the atomic bomb and peace to make our country become even stronger than what we already are and dropping the bomb on them will definitely show them who's boss, but why not show them who's boss without killing thousands of people and make peace happen? it states in, "Debate on the Pros and Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb," "A demonstration explosion over Tokyo harbor would have convinces Japans leaders to quiet without killing many people."

1 point

And by showing them what we can do and what might happen to them can potentially tear them apart and prove to them that we are not ones to mess with. It says on the, "Debate On The Pros and Cons of Dropping The Atomic Bomb On Japan," states, "Immediate use of the bomb convinced the world of its horror and prevented future use when nuclear stockpiles were far larger," which shows them that we will keep on advancing and that they will never reach up to are level because we will most likely win with all the technology we have that they don't!

1 point

If we are using a bomb on Hiroshima, then no one will be hurt because it's a deserted island that is why we need to use the bomb on a place where no one lives and where no one can be hurt, but in order for us to get the message across, we need to show Japan who's boss which makes us look better too. It states in the, "Memorandum, also known as the Frank report," says, "The best possible atmosphere for the achievement of an international agreement could be achieved of an international agreement could be achieved if America could say to the world, 'you see that sort of weapon that we did not use.'

0 points

In option 2 I believe that we can address this in a whole different manner where Japanese people wont be killed, countries will be warned about what America is capable of, and peace will be risen from the clouds of darkness. It states in the, "From the Historical Record," it says, "Within four months we shall in all probability have completed the most terrible weapon ever known to mankind."

JustinaGarc has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here