Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
LOVELESS
| Reward Points: | 0 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 1 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
I believe option 2 is the best bet, cause it shows more regard to human lives by only demonstrating the power of the bomb, and letting Japan decide if they want to carry on fighting and face massive destruction and loss of civilians, or back down. Evidence points in the direction of Japan surrendering anyway, but there's no way to be sure. So, this option is the best of both worlds, if they were gonna back down anyway, no one dies, if they were planning on carrying on it gives them good reason not to, and if they decide to fight even after the demonstration of the bomb, then that's their problem.
About Me
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
