Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

Welcome to Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day!

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!

Report This User
Permanent Delete

View All

View All

View All

RSS PhilboydStud

Reward Points:79
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.

Nah. I'd like to think that I'm making my little corner of the Earth a little nicer. Of course, I'm not thinking about my carbon footprint at the same time.

Another suggestion would be to take it easy on the ganja.

Exactly. I've always heard that plate tectonics are was what causes earthquakes. Nepal has a history of severe earthquakes.

Supporting Evidence: ref (

Do you mean to suggest it's wrong to help the weak? What should be done with them then? And do you believe only liberals want to help the weak?

I didn't know who I was until I read this debate. Thanks. Back at ya!

Anyone capable of working should have to do so in order to receive any public assistance. We would not want them to take away jobs from people gainfully employed, so give them work no one else seems willing to do. I for one would like someone to pick up litter around our main thoroughfares.

I truly feel bad for your generation. One of my daughters is currently in college, and another plans to start next autumn. When they graduate they will be modern day versions of indentured servants.

If I were the only person to take exception to the original argument, then I would agree with you. Clearly though this was not the case.

But you put no such qualifier when you posed your ultimate question.

No, you did not point to any specific God. My bad.

No, but the choices you gave were "I believe the scientists" and "Pffft". In logic I think is correct to interpret the lack of any quantification as meaning "all". It's like this fictitious argument:

a) Scientists are atheists

b) Albert is a scientist

Therefore, Albert is an atheist. That would be correct, because a) means "All scientists are atheists".

No, but I do find false dichotomies rather annoying. They're misleading.

PhilboydStud has not yet created any debates.

About Me

"I'm a good person."

Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Married
Political Party: Other
Country: United States
Religion: Atheist
Education: College Grad

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here