Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

What was this guy thinking? He got married to her without ever even seeing her face? Did they not kiss at all?

"and health care"

That's a joke, right?

............................................

You implied in your statement that Muslim Women must wear Burkas to be Muslim Women.

Factually incorrect cause I know Muslim women whom do not wear burkas, and any search or query of Muslim women, especially in Western societies, may even show that upwards of half don't. Especially amongst the young.

I'm not debating the intentions of the idea, I'm debating the feasibility.

Your reply doesn't answer the rest of my own reply, so I'll assume you concede those points?

In any case, you may have misunderstood. I'm not talking about the ability to be compatible, but that while in the game, whether it be a Pro-Choice game or a Terrorist-Game [more specific, of course] they would be focused on the similarities and nothing else.

My wording was incorrect, it indeed isn't an argument.

In any case, I think it is actually a case of black and white, however not like your putting it. Supposedly in each of these games people would be able to do the things they wanted, with other people. And yes, they would have those things in common. If you wanted to get more diverse in regards to goals and 'getting along' I'm sure there would be a 'Muslim Terrorist' game and a 'Christian Terrorist' game that would get increasingly specific.

I'm also fairly certain that you would be able to join more than one game, so the focus would be on the similarities of the players in that one game, even if in other regards they aren't remotely compatible.

Wait, wait, wait. The original article connected feminism and homophobia? How does that work out? I'm gay myself, and love to celebrate valentines day. And Gay people are increasingly represented in the Holiday, we do have purchasing power above straights per capital after all [800$Billion according to a study I saw recently] so it's profitable for the corporations to include us.

The argument Joe seems to be making goes beyond that. If abortion is illegal within your jurisdiction, you can not perform the procedure. The same is true with all types of things, Gay marriage, Gambling, Terrorism, etc etc.

In that case, this wouldn't work, because people would be to busy trying to impose their morality on the players of other games.

The Pro-Life games on the Pro-Choice games and vice versa, the Religious Zealots on the Gay games, the Terrorists on the Christian games...etc etc etc.

The natural human tendency to dominate would make it impossible for anyone to be content in their game.

At least, the way I look at it.

Would the 'players' be aware of the existence of other 'games'?