Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day



Welcome to Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day!

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Sergio_Ayala

Reward Points:6
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
80%
Arguments:6
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
6 most recent arguments.
1 point

so 5 million is not worth peace between two great nations.

0 points

5 million is not alot to create world peace even for a little while. Also, More deaths would have been caused if we had waited for their surrender; the deaths would have been less if we had dropped the bomb on a deserted island and had the japanese watch what would happen if they didn't surrender.

1 point

I agree that we could have just waited for Japan's surrender, but it would have cost thousands of lives more. A demonstration of the nuke would have ended the war along with the bloodshed quickly.

2 points

It was not a war of extermination, the japanese were predicted to surrender near the new year, although I do agree that the bomb was needed to end the war quickly. Just not on innocent civilians.

1 point

There is a more peaceful way to end the war, Option #2. It would scare the weary Japanese into submission, without casualties on either sides.

1 point

I believe option 2 is the right decision because the, ready to surrender, Japanese would have needed the little push to end the war; it would also save many lives on both ends.

Sergio_Ayala has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here