Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

It's probably because progressives tend to view themselves as perpetual victims and view their antisocial and destructive acts as just 'getting revenge' on whoever they think is to blame for their miserable lot in life, which is why you'll find a lot more evil and debased people on the left than you will on the right.

I agree, why do atheist spend so much time talking about something they say is a fictional character.

You don't see Christians spending that much time talking about the tooth fairy or the Easter bunny.

The universe is young, why are you waiting for 'ragnarok' when the notion of an end to the universe in many ancient texts was something not predicted to occur for billions, or even trillions of years and lifetimes.

This is an example of atheists ignorance of things that require deeper and symbolic thought, as well as their own vapid fascination with their own individual lives, which are as far as the universe is concerned, just a microscopic blip on the evolutionary radar.

The above is of course rubbish, "separation of church and state" is a myth, and was simply a ruse to attempt to squeeze progressive utilitarian ideology into government and treat it as a 'de-facto' state religion.

The true interpretation of the Constitution actively favored spirituality over atheistic and materialistic ideology, it simply didn't allow for one "sect" or denomination to be favored over others, but actively allowed for spirituality to be favored over atheism and secularism.

What made us a great nation, is that we were founded by philosophers and spiritualistic men who wanted a nation governed by the natural and objective law of God, rather than the whims of men and corrupt politicians.

For the record, studies such as Oxford Research have more or less proven that people, and even animals are born theistic (elephants for example engage in primitive forms of religious and burial rites), so no one is born atheist, atheism I believe is the result of psychological deviation and immorality, essentially one wanting to play God, much as Satan's rebellion was described in the Bible.

Truth is like it or not, many well-known atheists are evil people, such as Stalin, Marquis de Sade, possibly Hitler, and of course Karl Marx.

People who are morally fit to govern themselves without conventional religion don't have to worry about being governed by it.

Though generally it is those vile individuals who have a disproportionate distaste for religion who are the most in need of being governed by it.

Religion helps to govern uncivilized people much like laws and governments, so there's no logical reason to have a problem with that unless one is an anarchist and believes all government should cease to exist.

If you are an atheist, then you can't logically have any problem with 'liberals', as liberals who engage in acts of violence are simply practicing atheism and letting themselves be governed by their primal and barbaric impulses like any other animal, so they are your kind who logically you should embrace.

Not all church goers are spiritual, nor are all condo Dwellers atheistic.

My opinion is that with the exception of the English, Germanic, and Scandinavian nations, Europe is a more spiritual part of the world than America is, France and Switzerland, and the nations of the Romance languages in particular. You can judge how spiritual a nation is by its sense of aesthetics (as aesthetics is the language of God), Paris for example is far more beautiful than New York, so I would say Paris is a more spiritual nation, some may be confused into thinking they are atheist even if inwardly, they are not.

America today is quite materialistic and atheistic, most churchgoers are likely more atheistic in practice than spiritual in America, which of course ties in with the true message of religious texts, such as Jesus' claim about the narrow gate.

The true way to experience the essence of God is to meditate in solitude, rather than in a church if possible.

Not really,

Plus God doesn't create atheists or people's physical forms. Physical forms are the result of the laws of nature taking their course, which of course are not pre-determined per se. God would be the creator of the formal laws of the universe, mathematics and aesthetics, from which the essense of man, not his physical form comes, not the physical nature of man.

And as I mentioned earlier, rape is the practice of atheism, so rapists may explain from a Darwinian perspective why atheists haven't been weeded out, even though they should, as rape and murder are simply the practice of atheism unfettered. But if we could find a way to eliminate those things from existence, we'd eliminate atheism in the process.

The problem is that most atheists lack the intelligence and creativity to understand deeper philosophical concepts.

Being creativity-stunted (and often morally stunted as well, caring only about their meaningless material pleasures and sufferings), they only think in terms of external, material things, and view the messages in the Bible and world religions as just referring to literal, physical things, physical death, physical pain, etc.

They don't understand deeper philosophical concepts of symbolic thought, or the ways in which the formal sciences of the universe, such as logic and aesthetics tie in with religious mythology and symbolism.

This is essentially why "intelligence" as the West often measures it isn't a very good descriptor of personal competence or creativity.

The fact that the average atheist arguing about "God this, god that" on the internet is so creativity and emotionally stunted that he can't even get a date, when even most "stupid" people can, if anything shows that being an atheist is counter-productive to Darwinism, since being an angry, nasty atheist seems to decrease, rather than increase the odds of one being able to reproduce.