Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 115 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 89% |
Arguments: | 254 |
Debates: | 1 |
When can I order self-destructing flags? That's my next investment; Iraqi, Saudi Arabian, and Iranian flags that self de-fucking-struct. Oh, American flags, too. Can't miss out on that market. money to be made
The fact that despite your endless replies you have yet to bring up one substantial point; you prattle on endlessly without one useful thing passing through your skull. If you were anymore like a congressman, you'd be in office by now.
You pleasure yourself in your witless drone, and though I'm perfectly aware you'd be lost without a soul to aggravate, I continue to engage you in the hopes you'll tire and slink back into the desolate abyss you call an intellect.
Well, I guess that's less interesting than arguing with you. We're both winners!
Perhaps argumentative isn't the word: incessant is a more accurate description, I believe.
I seem to be under the impression that you're an argumentative little bugger with nothing to say and fewer words in which to say it. ;)
You hypocrite I never said you couldn't call me that without me calling you an insufferable distraction in return, you null-space. ;)
Offer me proof of anything supernatural; something outside of the realm of the known laws of physics that could only have originated from something conforming to the generally accepted notions of god, ghosts, goblins, ghouls, gremlins, or green men, and I'll let you have your seemingly sacred last word.
I'm glad you revel in the misery of others openly; most people aren't so honest.
No one has any proof, which is a major point many people forget about. The theory you've chosen to support now could be any number of models known as Cyclic Model and is entirely possible. The best thing about all of these cosmological models is that they all work without god in the equation.
No one has ever provided any empirical evidence supporting the god hypothesis; ever. God only exists in the minds of believers, and it is there his power is contained. Reality gives him no quarter, nor will it ever bend to the will of his minions.
Believe if you wish, I don't care to stop you. I only wish for you to consider the absurdity of a personal deity. An all-powerful deity, capable (allegedly) of living outside of our known reality. Capable, it's told, of creating consciousness and matter, defying ever scientific law ever established. He literally created everything.
BUT not only does he supposedly care about you, he's got two ass-tons of rules that you must follow to prove that you love him correctly or else you'll burn in hell for eternity.
Not only is that incredibly arrogant on the part of humanity, it's also way too masochistic for my taste.
I support the "nope" view and I am quite content! If you wish to think of me as some miserable, atheistic, grumble-hobbit that's fine, though. Placing all your trust in an imaginary being and allowing a over-grown cult to lead your life must be crushing.
|