Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
The_Agonist
| Reward Points: | 3 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 5 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
Perhaps it is just my interpretation of the unique grammatical constructions DevinSeay employs, but, for disputation, I would posit that DevinSeay's two statements contradict themselves.
Constitutional rights of an individual are not dependent on taxes nor a psycho-social sense of belonging.
There exist multiple Supreme Court precedents in which the court finds that the U.S. Constitution protects non-citizens (which I assume to be equivalent to the phrase "someone on the other side of the border").
One example is BOUMEDIENE et al. v. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., argued December 5, 2007—decided June 12, 2008. In this recent case, the petitioners, who are not U.S. citizens, have the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus.
This is just one of many precedents in which the Supreme Court has found in favor of the Constitution protecting someone on the other side of the border.
About Me
|
||||||||||||||
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
