Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 115 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 84% |
Arguments: | 145 |
Debates: | 7 |
That is a completely ridiculous argument. You can't just know whether or not a certain parent is going to be abusive, and sometimes the parents doesn't know yet either. So they often don't get an abortion anyway, because they never wanted one. I mean, really? Abortions are totally legal, and guess what? Abuse still happens ... then the child(ren) usually get seized by C.P.S. It has nothing to do with the fact that the woman "couldn't" get an abortion, otherwise you could've shown me proof. Your argument is extremely weak.
How much of a hypocrite can one person be? You're really going to emphasize my use of the word "it" while you're advocating for the murder of the baby? You don't have any concern for the unborn, so what does it matter to you how someone refers to them?
If I agreed that any child should be raised by an abusive parent, please quote me. Otherwise, keep your lies to yourself. Since when does a private adoption cost a woman anything? There are women who drop their children off at fire stations so that someone else will deal with the adoption process, and it's not even against the law. If she starts the process BEFORE the baby is born, her child is almost guaranteed to have a home by the time he/she is born. I think you're really confused about what the facts are.
Oh, and since you're talking about parents who "couldn't" get an abortion, and proceeded to kill their child later... can you please give me a link to some information about these events? I would really like to know when this has happened, and why the woman "couldn't" get an abortion or "couldn't" put the baby up for adoption. Chances are, she never even wanted an abortion; she was just a bitch that liked to hurt kids.
This is completely silly. It's as if everyone has forgotten the other options besides abortion. Men and women need to be more responsible BEFORE their actions result in pregnancy. And if they screw up, then they should not have the right to kill the child. Either carry and keep it, or carry and have it adopted. No excuses.
|