Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 7 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 95% |
Arguments: | 8 |
Debates: | 0 |
but there was nothing written or said that the war would actually stop if we dropped the bomb anywhere it could probably made them even more mad
but it can be the opposite too, maybe japan does follow the peace treaty!!!
they where teaching them to fight because the needed to defend them self because the had "japan had no allies"- secretary of war " and her navy is nearly destroyed"-secretary of war
But the Americans weren't sure that dropping the bomb was going to stop the war because the Japanese flowed the Bushido code,so dropping the bomb could of made the war worse
I disagree with Alejandra because dropping the bomb would be a waste of money because it cost a lot of money to make
Source (http://www.ushistory.org/us/51f.asp)
'The average cost of an atomic bomb during the World War II era: $5,000,000,000" -www.ushistory.org
"Number of of deaths sustained worldwide during WWII 72 million"-
bombing Japan would cause a lot of live to be lost , it would be a waste of money and japan was ready to surrender therefor making a peace treaty would be the best option
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |