Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

They are already allowed to do that. I don't know any women that get mad at men for not sitting down

Is that because women are willing to bear the pain for a good cause or because the man doesn't want a punch to the nuts?

Wouldn't doing this in itself be an act of racism? Just curious

Like, is a person who is missing 2 legs more handicap than a person missing 2 middle fingers?

I personally would think so. I mean unless the person missing the legs had prosthetic or mechanical ones that they were using

Can a person missing 2 middle fingers take a handicap parking spot with wheel chair access?

I wouldn't if I was missing both my middle fingers since I don't really see it as much of a handicap

Is it OK for a handicap person to have to wait, say 5 minutes, for a parking spot or should there already be one waiting for him?

I think it depends on the situation, but I tend to go along with the part of me that says that those spots are there specifically for the handicap people

Is it OK to park in a handicap spot for 5 minutes while you run in and do whatever it is and get out before the cops come to ticket you?

See previous reply

Is it OK to borrow a handicap person's car (and handicap sticker) to get their medication for them and park in the handicap spot?

I personally don't think the person should unless they them self have a legitimate handicap

If a person's only handicap is being obese, are you doing them a favor by forcing them to park far away and walking (exercise) to the front of the store?

I wouldn't say that I'm doing them a favor, but I wouldn't want someone who is obese to take the handicap spot from someone who actually needs it

Is Tourette's syndrome considered a handicap (if your reply is, "No," then... fuck you)?

I guess it would depend on how bad the Tourette's is. I actually have the disorder, but its pretty mild and I have it under control. However, if its to the point where it is actually hindering them pretty badly, then yes

Is it really a handicap to not be able to flip off a double amputee who is yelling at you for taking the wheel chair access handicap space and forcing him to wait 5 minutes?

I don't think so. Like I said earlier, I don't really see missing both your middle fingers as much of a handicap. It could obviously be much worse, but compared to a double amputee, there's not much thats missing

This is just my 2 cents

Adding them together is just a line you shouldn't cross...............

He's not. As it was mentioned before, a megalomaniac wouldn't send His son to die for us. It also sounds like you're assuming that God has no morally sufficient reason for anything that He does or allows to happen

There are no false truths. That is pretty obvious.

Except that something can't be both true and not true at the same time. Unless I misunderstood what you were trying to say. In which case, what do you mean by that?

Because the whole God story doesn't make sense.

Is there anything specific you can think of? Maybe I can help clear some things up

What if I'm not interested in debating it?

I didn't ask if you were interested in debating it. I asked what your definition of the word was. If you don't want to debate, we don't have to

Do I need evidence to speculate?

Not to speculate, just to support the claims that you made. I'm just looking for why you have the line of thinking that you do

What do i mean by debate it? Some books made it, others didn't.

That may have been a result, but it doesn't sound like a definition of debate

Lord it over everybody. "Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah we are God's chosen people and you're not. Want to be one of the chosen? Psych!"

What evidence do you have for this?

It would have been viewed as prophecy.

Same question here. What evidence do you have for this?

Aside from the Torah, the other books were not considered part of the bible because there was no bible. The bible came together centuries later when Constantine became a Christian and told his holy men to write the stuff down. The holy men then debated which books should make up the "bible."

You're right when you say that there was no bible until after all the stuff happened and people made it. I would have to ask what you mean by debated though