Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 360 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 81% |
Arguments: | 363 |
Debates: | 12 |
does are fundamental belief of the allowance for life, liberty, and pursuit of happens violate religious freedom? does fighting militant islmofacism violate religious freedom? the answer is yes. some religions or religious ideologies must be fought because they violate individual freedoms.
the fact that on 9/11 rememberence day there was a anti western pro militant parade by Muslims. the fact that the building was hit by militant terrorist Muslims. and the fact that most Muslims want sharia rule in America which is anti democratic and inhuman makes me believe that the mosque there would only be rubbing salt in a wound.
however there are moderate Muslims and people who disagree with the majority of Muslim middle easterners who support jihad and violence against western nations. so i believe there should be a compromise. if the state allows the mosque. then let it be built. if after review by 3erd party members of the mosque being supportive of the magnificent 11 or 9/11 terrorist and implements sharia and jihadist ideologies into its members and violence to outsiders. i say then close the mosque down.
so its simple. warn the Muslims that one out of line move will result in the termination of your mosque. end of discussion.
yes and no, but your anti military argument has made me disputed you.
why don't we shrink the military, then things would even out?
go tell Poland, France, and U.K of WW2 your idea, and go tell Israel of today your idea.
you'll see how a smaller military would be the worst thing to do.
and devestating our planet? becouse i forgot that america is number one in destroying our planet. not communist chinna ( a liberal state) who out puts the most co2 in the atmosphere and destroys the most rivers/lakes.
and i forgot america is number one in being selfish, (im supposing your later part of the sentince, to consver a little is so eveil, refers to us america), we have not only been number one in sending humintatian aid to the world, we have brought the most stability to countires of the world also, and i forgot that were out on the front lines in every attack on freedom while the U.N bichtes from the side lines about how were doing it wrong. yeah were the most destructive and selfish.
while i disputed you for sakes argument, liberals really are dumb. i mean no counter response that is reasonable to yours? when i my self have given the best so far, and i am conservative.
any way i like your agenda. keep pissing on liberals.
arguments like this make conservatives look bad. i mean wtf is this about. removed from society, if we did that we would be as bad as Hitler.
i am not liberal, i am conservative, but i must argue for reason when things like this our put up (i know this is just a fake fun debate most likely, but still what the hell, ima argue it). Hitler was a Conservative fascist. he was religious, believed in class structure, and supported family values. tyranny goes both ways on the political structure.
|