Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day



Welcome to Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day!

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic


RSS Riahlize

Reward Points:1575
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
96%
Arguments:1533
Debates:12
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Hahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha.

Wait, fuck you Joe! :p

1 point

I don't even understand how it's possible to acknowledge that discrimination against females exists, but not against males. It's just intellectually dishonest.

2 points

What I believe is the exact same oversimplified arguments homosexuals use to justify their behavior can be used by a lot of other groups

Including heterosexuals.

we all agree are immoral.

We don't all agree it's immoral.

A victory for homosexuality is an indirect victory for feminism,

That's not even a sexual identity....

transsexuals,

Possible.

bestiality,

Nope.

polygamy,

Possible.

pedophilia,

Nope.

and perverts of every kind.

And nope.

1 point

So is disputing me just an effect of you mocking goodmale's argument? Do you even believe any of the crap you're arguing in your dispute to me?

riahlize(1575) Clarified
1 point

So is disputing me just an effect of you mocking goodmale's argument? Do you even believe any of the crap you're arguing in your dispute to me?

1 point

Do you support neutering and spaying because they can't give consent to that but we do it anyway

I support the owner in legally neutering or spaying their animals. It does not require consent in a court of law to do so. Where as, if the issues were to arise about rape or consensual sex between humans and animals, that cannot be established in a court of law.

but let me guss you will say there is a difference because "neutering is not as bad as rape"

No actually, it's not as bad, but that is definitely not my reason. Don't get me wrong, I don't like neutering, but I realize if I want to have animals and they have territorial issues, I just might have to.

so before you say that

Yeah I wasn't going to.

there are still both wrong and until you take action at banning neutering and spaying

Way to convince me. They're wrong, so believe it.

your just a hypocritical.

Again, I didn't argue for that reason, you assumed. But even if I did, it's not hypocritical.

And anyway animals can give consent

Prove it.

and your are getting yourself into a argument that you don't even know much about like I do.

Certainly doesn't sound like you do.

1 point

Isn't it a little hypocritical to support homosexuality but not bestiality...

Nope. Not even in the slightest.

As he says his partners consent just like gay partners? Why are you judging his lifestyle, he isn't hurting anyone.

His desired partners, being non-human animals, cannot give consent. Hypothetically, let's pretend that objectively, the non-human animals wants to consent to sex. Humans have no way of verifying this. They are not able to tell us whether or not they give consent. Consensual sex is all about ethical law and non-human animals cannot contribute to that.

2 points

Not a whole lot

Aside from the person arguing for Zoophilia being an orientation, does it have anything to do same-sex couples being allowed to adopt?

except they are using the exact same argument as homosexuals to de-criminalize their actions. Goodmale has even gone so far as to tell me it is an "orientation

And I certainly will not support Goodmale's argument on it, he is in the wrong and I could refute his arguments if necessary. I absolutely disagree with his opinion on the subject.

With that said, is there is another reason?

1 point

Exactly. lol

1 point

Do you mean Zoophilia? If you do, what does Zoophilia have to do with same-sex couples allowed the ability to adopt?

Riahlize has not yet created any debates.

About Me


Biographical Information
Name: Riah 
Gender: Female
Marital Status: Married
Political Party: Other
Country: United States

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here