- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
You: Good thing that Ive been talking about more than just a mistake. You mighte'ev had a good point.
Me: Being stupid leads to mistakes. This is the implied relationship.
This implies that my claim of mistakes being valuable experience relates to your original comment: ""Adults" are just older children who have more confidence with displaying how stupid they really are. So who's gonna control the children?"
Neither. Many contracts include a clause that destroys the embryos upon divorce.
If there is no such clause then one of the plaintiffs must show some exceptional reason. If the court/arbitrator/whatever deems it exceptional, that plaintiff will receive the embryos.
For example, if the man or woman freezes the embryos in preparation for a medical procedure that will cause infertility, then they will usually gain ownership.
A form of love? Not all sex can be declared in the name of love.
Well, we were talking about consensual sex earlier. I figured that would be extended to my previous comment as well.
I am not familiar with the Bible, but I do not recall anything about sex with God = defile.
God's plan involves taking his children to Heaven to dwell in Heaven forever. Sexual relation with God is something that completely defiles his nature. God's nature doesn't change as he is most pure.
What is wrong with sexual relations?
The Bible allows for sexual relations between man and woman. Man was created in the image of God, wouldn't sexual relations be a good way for a woman to become intimate with God?