Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

18
17
True Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:35
Arguments:33
Total Votes:35
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True (17)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (14)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(39790) pic



Finally, a way to identify stupid people

 

True

Side Score: 18
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 17

True, it is one of the many ways to test stupidity.------------------------------

Side: True

The machine would automatically take you out (and I don't mean to lunch) right there on the spot ;)

Side: True
1 point

The only problem is that some people couldn't afford to test their stupidity, so maybe a smaller fee would be better. True, it wouldn't determine if they were extremely stupid or just having a laugh, but it would still show some results for the people that entered the money. If someone did decide to save up to test on $100 then that is really stupid, for they would have had time to think it over - but if you were that stupid maybe that wouldn't be the case, the writing would be a bigger barrier.

Side: True

Maybe we could have a button on the machine that says, "If you want the rich to pay for the test press this button." That way we can get rid of not only the stupid people but also those with a sense of entitlement ;)

Side: True
joecavalry(39790) Clarified
1 point

There..., I updated the picture by adding the button. Thanks for the suggestion ;)

Side: True
anachronist(889) Disputed
1 point

It's not a sense of entitlement to want the same rights as other people.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
3 points

Awww, those hard done by rich people, how dare we make them share their ridiculously vast amounts of money with the poor, the sick and children, it's tyranny i tell you! We shouldn't be giving those dirty poor people money, it's their fault for randomly being born in the wrong place at the wrong time. How dare they not choose to be rich! Why didn't they choose to have the right parents!

Stop being so selfish.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

If the poor stopped having babies then, by definition, the children would be born to rich families (right place, right time) and after a generation we would have beaten poverty. It's a win-win situation ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
anachronist(889) Disputed
1 point

And then there would be no one left to work for the rich, so again, a new generation of the poor is created.

Side: True

Not allowing the sick and the poor die off only makes the human race weaker. Think of it this way, if the sick and the poor die off, then the people who are left are the healthy and the wealthy. Miserable should be put out of their misery..., it's the humane thing to do. In other words, if you want to end poverty and sickness, then let them die off and, by definition, you've solved the problem ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
anachronist(889) Disputed
1 point

Sorry Hitler. So, a reinstating of social Darwinism eh, it would indeed make the human race stronger.

However, once all the poor are dead, there'll be no one left for the rich people to exploit for money, and all those republicans will have nothing to complain about. Remember, the reason the rich are rich is because the poor are forced to work for them, making the rich richer and the poor poorer.

Side: True
1 point

It's horrible, but I partially agree.

I don't want people to die, but people will die anyways. If it is only the people who cannot support themselves, I see nothing wrong with that. In the USA, everyone is given free education and the ability to get scholarships to get into college.

If you hate having a job, you can invent things or learn programming or write books or draw to make money.

If you have absolutely no valuable talents, then you are taking up food, and when there are people born in Africa who are starving, yet want to do great things, people willing to work or invent, and we are giving food and money to lazy people or people unwilling to make an effort to live in modern society, then I do not see why I should support that with my money.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!