Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

36
36
True. Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:72
Arguments:93
Total Votes:79
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True. (33)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (34)

Debate Creator

jolie(9805) pic



Yet Another Abortion Debate (YAAD)

When you think about it,

the argument:

"It is my body and I'll do with it as I see fit."

is rather

...

selfish.

True.

Side Score: 36
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 36
2 points

True. That is exactly what this is. Another Abortion Debate.

Side: True.
2 points

Does anyone even care about the little bastards?

Side: True.
1 point

Yes, abortion is selfish. You have already decided to have a baby, why abandon it after? There are even cases of gender-selective abortion! The baby, once its gender is known, is considered a sentinel being and should be given a right to live! Babies also have human rights, they are humans, they have the right to live, they SHOULD be given the right to live. If the mother just selfishly aborts the baby, the baby would not have a chance to live its life, and that is very selfish.

Side: True.
1 point

Yes, it is your body. You have the right to choose what you want to do with it. But, hey, if you don't like your baby, and you just abort it, saying, the baby has is not even born, it has no feelings, it is not a human, how about when you have a living child, and you don't like him/her, do you just murder him/her like that? NO! Exactly. Abortion is an extremely selfish thing to do.

Side: True.
0 points

Babies are humans and the government should protect the baby's rights to live.

Side: True.

This website really needs a moratorium on abortion debates. Nothing new is said, no progress is made. It's just the same people saying the same things and, ultimately, people calling each other names.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

Have we called each other names yet? If not, do you want to start or should I?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

If the host wants to destroy its parasite it can. You have no right to live if you physically rely off the body of another living thing to survive.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

If the host wants to destroy its parasite it can. You have no right to live if you physically rely off the body of another living thing to survive.

Why?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

Because it's the woman's body. If she doesn't want something inside of her body, growing off it then it is up to her.

Side: True.
GenericName(3430) Clarified
1 point

Children effectively live off of and rely on the bodies of their parents to stay alive, since without them they would not be provided for and would starve.

Do they lack a right to live?

Side: True.
1 point

It is different with Children who have been born because they are not attached to and inside a parent's body, being carried everywhere. Relying off something for food is different to being actually attached to it, feeding off its blood inside of it.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

The Nazis understood that in order to get normal people to kill other, normal, "people," they had to portray the "other, normal, people" as subhuman parasites.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
0 points

Godwin's Law, time to drink everyone :P

Always love to see how fast it is proven in abortion debates.

Side: True.

I think the abortion debates are an excuse to call names more like "I'm better than you" and feel to yourselves like your intelligent. I'm done.

I'm fine with name calling often if we're going to have "who's better" debates and not abortion debates. I feel the same way about atheism vs theism debates.

And I'm right about how I feel too so suck it mofos!!!

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!