Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

Welcome to Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day!

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!

Report This User
Permanent Delete

View All

View All

View All

RSS J-Roc77

Reward Points:70
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
1 point

You presuppose the debate presupposes a two way conversation.

Hope this helps.

1 point

I would choose living because dead people can't talk.

1 point

Sure, the American Family Association says it is sending men into womens restrooms to "test the law". This isn't a measure of risk but one of paranioa. A conservative group here is a the problem not transgenders. This still doesn't support any of the shortcomings that have been voiced ad naseum.

Never mind that your children/women have a higher chance of being abused by men they know rather than strangers, you know; family, members of school, teachers, priests. Never mind that transgenders do not equal predators. Never mind that you don't advocate for keeping predators out of restrooms you try to keep people predators "might pose as" instead.

Your logic is akin to saying bad guys might use guns are the problem. Either that or you have bigoted feelings towards transgenders and your crusade here is just another way for you to punish a group you don't like. Maybe a bit of both.

1 point

It doesn't seem like a good business model. I would want the car that tries to save me if there was ever an "either or" situation.

1 point

They have noses like humans so they probably smell like humans.


1 point

Maybe men prone to those things are the types that the Kardashians' are attracted to.

1 point

Edit. Double post.

2 points

Lets treat them like how we treat Radical Christians.

1 point

Sure a person has the right to offend someone else. The problem occurs when the "right to offend" is actually the continuation of systemic abuse towards others, then the "right to offend" is a fallaciously reduced excuse used to continue the systemic abuse of others. Saying that something is only "offending" people can be to ignore that the consequences can be far greater than simple offending others.

1 point

Edit, double post again.

About Me

"30's something guy. I have an interest in argumentation and philosophy. Here to test some ideas."

Biographical Information
Name: Jo Lo
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Married
Political Party: Other
Country: United States
Religion: Atheist

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here