you are paying for a lot worse things...trust me. the amount of tax dollars that goes to public aid/etc...is jack shit considering
if "they" stopped giving handouts...we slaves will still get taxed more and more each year...and it sure fuck aint going to be spent on roads, schools or any of that other BS people bring up as an excuse to get fucked by our government
for every dollar thats stolen from we the people...2 cents is probably used for the good of humanity
So your argument is that a job will take a person above the poverty line ? What about the Walmart workers on welfare or the many other examples of the working poor around the world . Having a job is no guarantee a person will every achieve wealth . Your understanding of poverty is naive and a typical neoliberal hogwash . What about the structural reasons of poverty ? But that does not suit the advantaged persons mindset that he is a self made man and got to where he is because he worked hard . " People with advantages are loath to believe that they just happen to be people with advantages."
OK, so your argument is that every job should pay enough for the worker to be above the poverty line? Maybe you're suggesting that everyone else should pitch in and help other people achieve wealth? Sounds to me like your understanding of poverty is naive and typical liberal hogwash. Not everyone is going to achieve wealth. So just suck it up and move forward. ;)
I see what you are saying, and you have a valid point. Im not arguing for anyone to pay for contraception at all. I hope you dont get that impression. if so, Im sorry. My concern is that they have a failure rate that im not very fond of.
getting the monetary system under control and utilizing our resources and technology is more important. but thanks to a bunch of rich fucks and corrupt governments that love feeling in power and inferior...there will always be big time poverty...
If we get the population growth under control, it should be easier to manage to reduce the number of children living in poverty. It's for the children ;)
When you are born into poverty then you will most likely be bored with not much to do. Sex is nice entertainment cuz It's free. Then throw in cheap drugs and alcohol and wala!
Yousee, most people in poverty don't have vehicles so they would have to walk to thestore every time they want to fuck, which is a lot. Some others don't live close enough to a store that sells rubbers.
Also, the excess use of drugs and alcohol distorts their senses, which means they forget to do the reasonable thing.
And also the many parasites that they all most likely have would be fucking with their body's chemistry, making them act on cravings instead of thinking things through.
Poverty may not cause boredom . The largest group of drug users in my country, Ireland, is middle class women, not poor junkies . Drug use and sex to fight boredom is across all social classes . Just look at the actor who died recently Mr Hoffman . Manhattan upper class relapsed and died , may he rest in peace . The man must have been deeply unhappy and bored.
Which is why we should not make life any easier for the poor. If we did, they would just get bored since they would no longer have to fend for themselves. We are doing them a favor and keeping them drug free by letting them work for whatever little they have. And while we're at it, we should bring back freeway shootings ;)
It'd cut down on the number of abortions. As far as the choice element, I don't care about that choice. Think about it this way. If the choice is kill a person, or never restrain that person to have to kill them, I feel better letting you choose to not restrain that person.
They'd never go for this though, so they should be made infertile at birth, and then when they have good enough credit and financial ability they come to get the option reversed.
I hate to say it, but we should follow what Iran did.
Starting with:
"The only governmental disincentive was elimination of the individual subsidy for food, electricity, telephone, and appliances for any child after the first three."
What a long winded douche. There is long winded, but this goes beyond that 1/3 of the way through he finally addressed the subject of the article. 1/2 way through he was done explaining. I have no idea what else he could have talked about.
