Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

  Gun control means two hands on the gun. And remember.... No matter how excited you are about buying your first gun, do not run around yelling 'I have a gun! I have a gun!'

http://www.kernelmag.com/features/report/5755/why-dating-sites-are-desperate-to-keep-you-single/# OkCupid, match.com and eHarmony promise the world, but are actually incentivised to keep you alone, furiously and miserably clicking through thousands of profiles in the hope of finding love.  

I happen to be in the industry and we are currently working on the 4D printer.  The 3D printer can only send plans over the 3G network and Apple's new iPhone 5 does not support 3G anymore.  They are using 4G, thus making the 3D printer obsolete.  Besides, transmitting 4D plans over a 4G network is much faster and all you have to do is start with a 3D printer and add one more D.  The early adopters of 3D printers were fooled into thinking that those machines are not version one (i.e., first generation) but they are; which is why people should wait for the 4D models being released late in the 4th quarter.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/48/38/fb/4838fba425b11bd91e0b2e8bda905f39.jpg

We should change the definition of the N-Word to something that is not offensive to anyone.  Change it to something like "a very dear and close friend."We have changed the definitions of, "Looter," "Marriage," "Man," "Woman," "Gender," etc..   Changing the definition of the N-Word would just be one more word in the mix of words that have been redefined.

a bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush.

 

But I especially hate it whena store is jammed packed fullof white people.

The libertarians ought to be all over it like white on rice.  I want to be all over it but I have other matters to take care of first.

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-03-28/bitcoin-may-be-the-global-economys-last-safe-haven There are 10,952,975 Bitcoins in circulation. (With a digital currency you can be specific.) Bitcoin isn’t about to replace hard currency—with a market cap of $864 million—but it’s bigger than anyone expected. And many people will tell you that the emergence of a virtual global money supply beyond the reach and control of any government is very real and that it’s time we take it seriously. As long as the Internet remains turned on, Bitcoin will be there—to its adherents, it’s the Platonic currency. A Bitcoin’s not so much a thing as an understanding, a balance in a decentralized general ledger, or “account log.” Bitcoins are created as the side effect of a great deal of meaningless computational work. That is, the computer could be working on processing images, or doing something else with its time, but instead it’s being used to “mine” Bitcoins—searching for mathematical needles in a networked haystack. Once the needle is found, a “block” of Bitcoins is born. Bitcoins live in a bit of software known as your “wallet.” How did they get there? Perhaps you minted them by mining, or bought them on an exchange, or received them as part of a barter transaction. Once you have Bitcoins, you want to buy something. How do you spend them? Clicking around your wallet app, you set up a payment and put in the Bitcoin address of the recipient. A few minutes later, after the peer-to-peer network has authorized the transaction as legitimate, the recipient’s wallet, wherever it is, will show that you’ve paid up. Bitcoins are not pegged to anything, and there are no regulations. It’s a supercomputer-size chore to counterfeit. The key thing to understand is that there’s no bank, no Federal Reserve, in the middle (can you say, "Screw the Fed." ;). It’s not unlike an exchange-traded fund—a mix of non-U.S. currencies—designed as a hedge against the dollar. Bitcoin is a hedge against the entire global currency system. And no exchange is needed, unless you want to convert your Bitcoin into an actual hard currency.  http://bitcoin.org/en/

Should I have someone post a picture of my tombstone on all of my social media accounts when I die?Then, after some time, that someone could have my tombstone updated with the total number of likes, smiley faces, down votes, etc. and the icon associated with each number.

Every once in a while people complain about the site and say that the level of debates and arguments are sub par. Examples:Some people complain about too many religious debates.Others about personal attacks and trolls.They talk about leaving the site.etc. But the problem is not the site.  The site attracks very many different types of people with different styles and level of debating skills.  There are different age groups, nationalities, political persuations, religions, education, etc.  You are bound to meet a lot of people you don't like and/or agree with.  This site has mechanisms in place that allow you to find the people you enjoy debating with.  You can use the site's capability to search for the the types of debates that interest you.  You can read through the arguments and identify people you want to argue with.  You can then use the site's capability to create your own community and use the site's message capability to invite those people to your community.  If undesirebles show up, the site offers the capability to ban them. In short: There's no reason to look for another site; build the site you envision and moderate it the way you think it ought to be run using the capabilities provided by the site. If you build it, they will come. Hopefully not in your eye.

He was woke when he dreamt it.

  http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/07/health/charlotte-child-medical-marijuana/

In a recent interview with NPR's Lulu Garcia-Navarro, Biden said: "I will not interfere with the Justice Department's judgment of whether or not they think they should pursue a prosecution." But he hastened to add that an administration pursuing criminal charges against its predecessor would be "a very, very unusual thing and probably not very, how can I say it? good for democracy — to be talking about prosecuting former presidents."

It is a fad that will just have to run its course and eventually be replaced by something else.  Probably by people who are "dray."  A "dray" person is a person who loves, has sexual relations with, and whishes to marry, a robot or android. This fad is also very similar to the Obama fad.  The Obama fad should come to an end come 2016.  Until then, we'll have to endure it.  Hopefully it will not be replaced with a Hillary fad.  

Should an illegal immigrant, Iraqui terrorist, drug addict, Christian racist, gun carrying, Obama supporter, gay Democrat woman be allowed to marry, get artificially inseminated, divorced before giving labor and get an abortion in the U.S. or should she just get the death penalty for combining way too many issues into one person?  Should her story be covered under Free Speech?   I think I hit quite a few Hot Button Issues but I couldn't fit Global Warming, Animal Rights, the Constitution, Economy, Evolution, Oil, Parenting and Ron Paul into the question.  So did I push any of your buttons ;)