Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

The Democrats and Republicans are in cahoots with each other.  The Democrats need to act like they really care about the people.  But in reality, they don't give a hoot.  That's why they allowed the Republicans to steal the Supreme Court nomination hat became available during Obama's term.  The Democrats secretly want the Supreme Court to do away with all the liberal bullshit Obama administration pushed through.

Ever since Kavanough was 18, he was an excemplary person.

the alternative is 18 years of child support.

Men should stop having sex with women.

But if a little girl sees a penis in the lady's room, it is considered tolerance?

I think.

Strategy 1:  Live in large groups and in close proximity to each other (like a school of fish and herding animals).  Humans live like packed sardines in large cities.Strategy 2:  Grow large (like elephants, hippos and rhinos).  Humans are getting fatter and fatter with each generation.

Liberals spend more time regurgitating the party line, coming up with catchy slogans, and making signs than they do in actually engaging in the thought process.  That is why when conservatives use logic to disprove their world view, they get agitated and start labeling people racist, sexist, homophobe, etc.  

let them live in sanctuary homes.

Let us say Trumps policies are 10% racist, 20% political and 70% greed.  A liberal would focus on the racist part and not move past that.  Thi debate itself is nuanced.  This debate is not about Trump, his policies nor about the driving force behind those policies.  This debate is not even an attack on liberals.  This debate is about nuanced truth.  There is absolute truth but most truths are nuanced.

An armed society is a polite society.SimilarlyIf we were to implementThe PurgeThere would be less liberals herewho start their arguments with:You idiot!You racist bastard!You homophobic jerk!You sexist pig!You right wing nut job!Etc.

More and more products are now coming with license agreements.If these license agreements are so great,why not replace warning labels with license agreements?- Instead of this -Warning: Do not use this electric hair dryer in the shower.Warning:  Do no stick Q-tip into ear.- have this -By purchasing this product you agree to not use it in the shower.By purchasing this product you agree to not stick it into ear.Once this is accomplished, the next step is to apply it to guns.By purchasing this product you agree to not be an ass-hole and murder people with it.Then, if they try to sue the gun company, the gun company could say,"Your honor, that gun was not manufactured for the purpose of murdering people.In fact, our license agreement specifically states that it will not be used for the purpose.We would like to sue the defendant for violating the license agreement."Murderers would not only face murder charges,they will also face license agreement violation charges.Faced with all this litigation, the number of murders committed in the U.S. will drop.

Instead of A/B/C/D cup sizesthey should useHalf pint/Pint/Quart/Half Gallon/Gallon.Much more descriptive.The Europeans can go Metric.

Whitey appropriated/stole Native American lands and made it (at least initially) so that only land owners could vote (have power).This was no easy feat.  The natives fought back hard.  But eventually whitey killed enough natives to win.The system protects itself by giving people hope that they too can become land owners.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home-ownership_in_the_United_StatesBut the playing field is not even as evidenced by the fact that most homes are owned by whites.A similar scenario is being played out in Israel.However, it is harder to the Zionist to kill enough Palestinians in order to win because Palestinians are reproducing at a faster rate.It is interesting to note that the top breeders are the Indians and the Chinese.Regardless.Both models work.Eventually a group of people will ask another group:Group 1: "How did you acquire these lands?Group 2:  "We inherited them from our fathers and they from their fathers."Group 1:  "How did your original ancestors acquire these lands?"Group 2: "They fought for it."Group 1:  "Will fight you for it!"orThey will just out breed them.

No one knows.It has never happened.

When a group of people get all offended because "their culture is being appropriated," what they are really feeling is frustration at their inability to monetize aspects of their culture for their own benefit while other people who are not of their culture have no problem monetizing said aspects.  It is also important to note that the poorer the culture, the more indignant they're going to feel.  For example, you won't hear a Harvard or Yale student bitching about some other group of people appropriating their preppy style.

If whitey were to share the wealth with people of colorpeople of color may become more appreciative of whitey.OrThey could use their new acquired wealth to take whitey out.