Then do it im kind of sick of this kid just in a constant state of denial when i clearly make arguments.

You wont explain to me because you know you just helped call yourself out on your own illogical nonsense ; ) I dont know what biased you have against me as this is supposed to be a debate of ideas but you continue to attack me. good luck jatin

You yourself said you know what ad hominens are yet you still use them knowing they are illogical?

If you understand ad hominems then you would know not to use them but you continue to do so ; ) you dismissed yourself

"You're disgusting and a pathetic liar."

even if this was true it is not relevant to the debate and not a refute against my argument you were supposed to refute two arguments ago.

"I don't consider you worth a link from my profile, especially on the allies list. It looks disgraceful there. We don't really have the feature right now, though, so you're acting more like a sticky parasite there. Luckily, I'm not in too much of a hurry about that.

Now fade away. You're dismissed."

This is completely irrelevant to this debate and rather your personal attempt to insult me.

Read the name of this site then answer your own question.

Sorry the debate is already over end result ended due to your inability to refute my points or defend your own which I responded to. :D good day

You will not reply which is your forfeit to the debate. Therefore I have won. Good day :D

You have just posted nothing but denial of my post without sourcing it in anyway. Due to your inability to refute anything on my post I have clearly won here :D good day to you and our illogical buddy jatin.

You have not refuted anything except one of my points here. I have clearly proven myself correct and proven your inability to debate. Due to your inability to refute almost my entire argument above I have clearly won :D however what a terrible waste of time that was.

"Seriously, who let you on a computer that connects to the Internet?"

This is not a refute. Invalid

"The joke's on you."

This is not a refute. Invalid

"Great. You post definitions without reading them."

I clearly do and I use them perfectly : )

Thank you again jatin for your illogical nonsense of a worthless post.

Were are you getting equity?----------------------------------------------------- oh and ty for noticing my profile :D

No the result is invalid due to the invalid definition you gave.

What are you even saying?? Your claim on the other debate was one of the worst worded and thought out cases I have ever seen Go to my response if you want to see some freaking logic. I am trying to show you guys how to form basic arguments.

Let me note it is pitiful that I have to explain this. And even more pitiful that you continue this biased against me and make comments like this just to annoy me.

This is his first statement

It's still better than the religions. I could create better fairytales on the same drugs, yet they're the ones people follow, and take as their opium.

Though it'd be better if we got to say that. But sadly, it won't happen.

This statement is saying "Atheism is still better then religions. Jatin could create better religions on drugs. Yet the religions made on drugs are the ones people follow, and use the religion like drug users use opium." and sadly

"Though it'd be better if we got to say that. But sadly, it won't happen."

just makes no sense

First let me point out this is a terribly written argument as a whole. I don't like to nit pick about grammar but the entire statement except the claim is off. Now I know dermot you like to say this is me throwing the debate on a diffrent topic and this is just wrong I am just pointing out that it hinders me to have to translate nonsense into more nonsense.

Second the only thing we can call a claim here is when he says Its still better then religions. In which he does not offer how. He lists nothing about how this statement is true no support nothing. Is that clear?

Third the ability to think up a religion has no sway on merit here. It just does not matter. The grass is green and shit stinks good job??

and the rest of it is nonsense it just logically does not connect to this debate at all.

unless in saying "yet they're the ones people follow" he is referring to his previous sentence were he references the "i can create better" nonsense then that means he is saying "Religions people make" which would leave religions made by well god himself? His whole argument makes no sense and is poorly worded

Now in the comment after I said he makes no points against the debate which is true. The only thing he has in that comment is an empty claim. not the same as a point.

Then Jatin continues to say

" I'd recommend you read more carefully than that.

(Hint : IT'S LITERALLY THE FIRST FEW WORDS.)"

The first few words are

"It's still better than the religions."

which is an empty claim. He also leaves the rest of his argument unjustified therefore meaning they are dropped. So again nonsense

I say

""Its still better then religions" this is an opinon in order to prove this you need to say why this matter in anyway other then your own head.""

This is a refute you do this in a debate dermot and it proves that yes I have been debating him not just spouting nonsense

He says

"Anything else I've said there is in support of it. You can read other of my arguments if you want it much longer. You're free to browse them all.

Or you can put your reasoning here if you disagree with mine, and I might destroy your claims if they seem worthy of attention"

In response there is on support this I have clearly shown. Also the burden of truth is on the one who makes the claim so no I dont have to go anywhere you have to prove your own point you need to list the reasoning for your claim I shouldn't have to search for your own reasoning to your own claim

Or you can put your reasoning here if you disagree with mine, and I might destroy your claims if they seem worthy of attention"

missing some punctuation or somthing but this makes no sense.

So Dermot I have shown not only that Indeed I did debate him as I said I did you just didnt want to read the already going debate thread. And I have yet again gone back to show how pitiful jatin's argument is here.

No you all don't know how to write a proper debate claim. Much less debate in the first place.

That is idiotic. The definition given is false then. ----------------------------------------

Read above I have clearly debated this person at first he started this nonsense

Insanity-the state of being seriously mentally ill; madness.

don't know were you got your definition from there but not true at all.

This is not a debate case. This is the evidence you forgetting your claim there. Your supposed to make a claim say what is true then site the sources providing the truth.

You should not treat a mentally disabled or handicapped person the same as someone without a disability.

Treat-behave toward or deal with in a certain way.

I would never deal with someone with a mental disability the same as someone without because the person with said mental disability may not understand what I am saying

same for someone with a physical disability like lets go on a walk, oh wait. All jokes aside lol

And for the race thing ofc I will deal with different races differently most races have different cultures so it would make little sense to behave the same way around every culture.

you are the most confused person I have ever met on this site. And that is saying something. You don't even know what is going on do you? Do you have a mental disorder? If so I am just going to stop debating you as I don't have the time to explain myself to someone of such low caliber.

good lord YOU need to write a claim and evidence leading you to such claim. What you first stated is a opinion gtfo of here with this nonsense.

I have refuted. I have said that what you stated is an opinion not an argument. You need to write an argument then I can really debate you.