I failed to convince you of the truth

This is where you seem to run into difficulty a lot. The definition of "truth" is not "what I personally believe". That is exactly the same trap religious people fall into, so your childish attempts to yet again regurgitate another debate you lost 3 weeks ago (and are still sore about) only serve to expose you as someone being compelled by the irrationality of emotion to defend your beliefs.

but that is not the same as a loss.

Being wrong is the same as a loss, and you're wrong that science isn't an ideology/religion.

The problem is you don't know the difference between scientific thought and believing in whatever the scientific community tells you to

No, the problem is that you don't know how to accept being wrong. It makes you exactly the same as someone like Yeshua, albeit the fact you stand on polar opposite ends of the belief scale.

You have the right to stop replying.

You have the right not to torture other people with insane nonsense from the dark ages.

God in human flesh

Please stop your babbling. I'm not interested.

The fact that you can't tell the difference between that and science is very unfortunate. James "science is a religion" DD.

Shut up child. We've already had this conversation, and you lost.

Religion does not save, but Jesus does.

Jesus only exists in your head.

Don't you know how much He loves you?

Don't you know how much Elvis loves you? Elvis rose from the dead to be lord and saviour. I don't need evidence that Elvis talks to me because I'm insane and that's one of the great benefits of insanity. You don't need evidence or reason. You just say stupid stuff and act like it's real.

All Christian means is to know Jesus Christ with Him as your God, Lord, and Savior.

You're batshit insane. I'd like to write an intricate response but you don't deserve it and it would be wasted in any case because you're batshit insane.

Yeshua is the Hebrew word for salvation and the Hebrew Name for Jesus.

So you claim to be a Christian, yet are naming yourself after words derived from Judaism?

Are you confessing that you are Jewish?

If we give everyone guns, those being shot at can shoot back

If you take everybody's guns, nobody would need to shoot back because nobody would be getting shot.

There will always be a number of people who will manage to squirrel away a few guns ;)

Which obviously is a lot better than everybody having guns. I just don't understand how anybody could believe it would not be better for 500 hardened mafia soldiers to have guns than 375 million random people. That's like saying you'd rather every single country in the world had nuclear weapons instead of just North Korea.

If the criminnnnnnnnnnnal does nnnnnnnnnnot want to be shot, he or she should not break in someone's house.

If you don't want to be punched in the face, you shouldn't say stuff which is childish and provocative.

Is that dumb, or what?

It's nowhere near as dumb as accusing actual scientists of being "science deniers" you retarded hypocritical scumbag.

Here we go again. Another partisan

You are an absolutely astounding hypocrite. Astounding.