If poor families stopped having babies then, by definition, the children would be born to rich families (right place, right time) and after a generation we would have beaten poverty. It's a win-win situation.  Or we could just let them die off ;)

Liberals are always telling people what to do like:  Wear your seat belt, don't smoke, tax alcohol, etc. because "It's good for the environment, the children, you, etc."  Well..., why don't they say, "If you're poor, you can't have children.  It's good for all of us."  The Chinese didn't go quite that far.  They said, "You can only have one child."  But we are better than the chinese and I think we can go the extra mile ;)

Currently the liberal plan is to tax the rich and give it to the poor.  But that does no one any good because the poor become dependent on the rich and never learn to fend for themselves, the rich feel ripped off working hard so that the lazy poor can make-ends-meet, and the country doesn't get wealthier because all you are doing is redistributing wealth.

With my plan, the poor have more money because they don't have kids to take care of, the rich get to keep their money, and the country becomes wealthier because there won't be any poverty left after one generation.  Is that really such a high price to pay for all of these benefits the plan provides?

Finally, the liberals would be the perfect people to implement this plan because they already have abortion in place.  It's just a matter of being smart about who to abort ;)