Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

3
2
true wait..., what? No!
Debate Score:5
Arguments:5
Total Votes:5
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 true (3)
 
 wait..., what? No! (2)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40130) pic



the homeless should occupy the homes of the people occupying wall street

 

they can call themselves

#occupyoccupywallstreethomes

true

Side Score: 3
VS.

wait..., what? No!

Side Score: 2
joecavalry(40130)
1 point

I really don't are what people do as long as they stay off the freeways during rush hour ;-)

Side: True
Support Dispute Clarify
Liber(1712)
1 point

If the "occupiers" aren't using it, then the homes are going to waste. Philosophically-speaking, the "occupiers" should be all for it.

Side: True
Support Dispute Clarify
supremepizza(846)
1 point

They can blow up wall street for all I care, as long as I get my morning grapefruit with a little bit of sugar and a nice cup of orange juice every Saturday, and as long as no-one touches my DVD and Blu Ray collection I don't care what anyone does ;)

Side: True
Support Dispute Clarify
garry77777(1775)
1 point

How about the top 1%, im sure they've got plenty of room in their houses, i imagine they're quite large, plus most of them probably have multiple houses all over the country and they can't be in two places at the same time (law of conservation of mass) so why don't the homesless shack up in those houses, if you think about it its a much more practical solution;-)

Side: Wait..., What? No!
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
joecavalry(40130)
1 point

What do you mean by the 1% having homes that aren't occupied? Don't you think that they have maids maintaining those properties? ;)

Side: Wait..., What? No!
Support Dispute Clarify

Browse More Debates