I don't even get what you are saying.

Just an FYI, that's because you are dumb.

Geting caught by who?

The members of this website.

For what? to what court or prison?

The court of public opinion.

You find it insulting because you yourself are not really a Christian and you don't want to get caught.

Today's new age Liberal Christian basically makes up their own version of Christianity.

False. Every Christian in the history of the religion makes up their own version. Especially you.

Oops. Looks like I broke the chat bot.

You're

Only idiots think I am a progressive. So, do you think I am a progressive?

To all the Conservative debaters, how many times have you heard these deceptive liars deny being a Progressive, or Liberal or Democrat?

Never. The people who push that narrative admit to being Democrats. It's the people who aren't pushing that narrative that deny being Democrats.

I figured out you can't read or listen the very first time I told you that I wasn't a progressive.

You think I don't exist because I am a minority. How fucking dumb is that.

I am not a progressive ... still. If you weren't a liberal you would have been able to read that before. It is clear that you liberals can't listen either. I'll give you that one.

Cuomo made it clear to me that he was answering a question that wasn't being asked. The only way he could have done that was by not being able to read.

You don't have to read it you can listen to it !

What a coincidence. A liberal like you needs it read to you instead of reading it yourself. Thanks for proving my point.

Can you see the link in the description? He posted his source.

It's about changing the process to be more strict. As I have already pointed out to you, your entire idea of our vetting process is completely false. There are 2 issues. Whether or not we even need to improve our vetting system, and if we need to ban people until the vetting system is improved. Technically, this debate is about showing a stupid picture of a vet on a skateboard.

Unfortunately, it only shows that liberals don't know how to read.

The current vetting processes is question and a slap on the wrist. Are you a terrorist, are you going to commit a terror act, do you think of suicide, do you think of killing people, are you sick, and then the slap on the wrist to deter them from doing anything.

Not any crying process used on planet Earth.

Does that sound like a vetting process of course not

What a coincidence. A fictional vetting process doesn't sound like a vetting process.

but it is the main idea right now in the United States vetting program.

Nope, not at all. Not even close.

The banning of those 6 countries are temporary and will be allowed back when the vetting process is changed and more thorough.

It's not about the ban being temporary.

He doesn't come off as unreasonable, he comes off as wrong to liberals.

What's "aborti"?

How many rioters have you stopped?

So, you are against riots, but for vigilantes?

No, you are missing the point. What I do get is that you are an ideologue that hates the truth. Ideologues want biased media. That's how biased media ends up existing. It isn't a liberal only thing. I remember when blaming everyone else for your problems was only done by liberals. It's a shame that those times are over.

The media shifted from neutral to biased reporting because of people like you. The media changes based on its audience. When they see people take sides and ignore everything about their own side the media will change to only show one side of the story because the audience ignores the other side anyway.

I read more of the link you provided than you did.

There is no way to separate the conflict in a situation where there shouldn't be any conflict. There is no appeasing the religious right on this issue.

Normally people are arrested. This one is weird.