This is a good point, but it lacks refutation. The basis of it, is in theory only
That's exactly my point. It's a loophole because you can avoid the punishment, that you clearly deserve.
For instance: If I were to kill a man, I could simply go back in time to keep myself from killing him, so that I would die with a clean slate.
That wouldn't have a number to text, so I am sure that they would write letters.
Both of them are sluts, god forgives them, but I would say the tanned skin looks the most appealing.
If he didn't take any pictures with Mandella while he was there.
I wasn't asking for affirmation for my crappy grammar.
Your response is redundant at most.
It makes sense to wonder what's wrong with people and even yourself. If you don't know the cause behind this weakness in people, then shut the fuck up responding.
Still not comprehending the definition of "everybody" I see. Pupupupupu
Says the guy who said "They doesn't prove" and "There was no describing words."
No shit dumbass. Did I not ask if it was everybody who had crappy grammar?
The definition of "everybody" must be too much for you to comprehend.
No. He didn't say that. There was no describing words in his sentence.
Does everyone here have crappy grammar usage?
They doesn't prove that your sterilization can be reversed, you fucking cock sucking deepthroating cumdumpster.
Generally, white males don't care whether they are called derogatory names that are derived from their physical features.
They don't make a big deal out of it, so no one cares.
Maybe we shouldn't stop them completely, just make it a little harder. Sterilize everyone at birth, and allow anyone to be unsterilized if they want.
You can't be unsterilized.
It's not even a word.
I am agreeing with this. This would also lower the rate of the non believers of faith.