Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Kite626's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Kite626's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

ooo okay !

2 points

Ouch.... caught red handed. On the two accounts of; 1. hypocrisy 2. Contradiction. Judged by, HELLNO. Penalty = DEATH

1 point

You're such a troll :3 !

Kite626(714) Clarified
1 point

That's coming from the account, named: "hitler..?" The irony lol, in all honesty i didn't think it was all that depressing just a hypothetical thought. It's kind of hard to debate, "happy" topics. Not everyone will feel all one emotion on a topic.

2 points

Oh... well dang, i thought this was going to point out all of the religions predating Christianity yet holds the same stories.

1 point

What will cause this virus, and why.. ?

Kite626(714) Clarified
1 point

I was curios about this before, seriously research it a bit. I wasn't stating something fully opinionated. The only thing that is my opinion is that exposure to porn does less harm than not to be exposed.

1 point

......? Isn't that just them giving people free food with a side of guide lines to better health..? That's like asking if tobacco companies should pay billions to help with cancer and dental care. Why should they suffer the consequences for supplying a consensual demand.

1 point

Most people who commit sexual acts typically tend to have a psychopathic mentality. I'm pretty sure 70% have it, those who commit this desire. Sense they don't have emotional cognition. It is very likely that those who were mentally stable before they delved in did become influenced. On the other hand the majority of those who have a likelihood to do such a thing (psychopaths.) would now have the means to feed that desire with porn. For your question, technically it does cause a higher likelihood. The big picture that should be looked at, which does more harm; not having for those who have the desire, or to have it to feed and tame most offenders cravings.

2 points

Anything is contemplatively possible. But it soon becomes implausible once putting those thoughts into act. There is always a possible way. Although that changes once you realize even if it was possible, the action that it requires could be impossible. Yes, i think time travel is possible. I just don't think it's possible for us to use, find, and or create what ever the method is.

1 point

Without imagination there is no knowledge. When human civilization began, so did knowledge along side it. I don't see how they could have procured knowledge then without imagining something than testing it. Imagination is the foundation, without it our knowledge would collapse.

1 point

Your statement is flawed, it's based on the premise on thinking it was in fact japan who attacked the harbor. (which is a completely irrelevant debate to the atomic bomb.) The atomic bomb is one of the worlds biggest mistake ever. It's just like when guns were introduced, those who had the mass quantity of artillery held more, "power." Well this new falsified "power," is the power that ends as a whole. I'd much rather appear weak, than to risk the outcome of, "M.A.D." I Agree with you though that it was the end of the beginning. The only thing now though, is that we will inevitably procure something more deadly and reincarnate the next ended beginning. The end in the world. It's a ripple affect, the pebble is power. The first ripple being Spears, bows, arrows, etc. Then to swords, then to guns, and so on. We need to slow our power hungry roll, before we reach that last ripple. (Leave them alone.)

-----SORRY IF I WASN'T SUPPOSE TO INPUT ON A CLASS DEBATE, i was interested-------


2 of 6 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]