Phoot.

But I have more money than you, so....

Are you sure?

You listen to Wilco? What an old fart. Phoot.

You: Good thing that Ive been talking about more than just a mistake. You mighte'ev had a good point.

Me: Being stupid leads to mistakes. This is the implied relationship.

This implies that my claim of mistakes being valuable experience relates to your original comment: ""Adults" are just older children who have more confidence with displaying how stupid they really are. So who's gonna control the children?"

Need more head people in the world.

I think the head vs heart dilemma also depends on the situation. People get emotional over different things.

So, your point to substantiate the point is the point.

It seems implied by this statement.

Neither. Many contracts include a clause that destroys the embryos upon divorce.

If there is no such clause then one of the plaintiffs must show some exceptional reason. If the court/arbitrator/whatever deems it exceptional, that plaintiff will receive the embryos.

For example, if the man or woman freezes the embryos in preparation for a medical procedure that will cause infertility, then they will usually gain ownership.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/san-francisco-couple-bitter-divorce-battle-over-frozen-embryos-n393126

Since this was a communication between two individuals, you would have show that your transmission was clear in order to infer that I misinterpreted it.

I already pointed out the different between "point" and "summation". Your ball.

Who does not want to see a cat's butt hole?

The people on that <--- side, that's who.

From what I can tell, strict gun legislation alone will only prevent mass murders, not violent crimes. (At least until someone comes up with a better mass-murder weapon.)

making us all endure the bull shit.

I always took you for a coprophile.

A form of love? Not all sex can be declared in the name of love.

Well, we were talking about consensual sex earlier. I figured that would be extended to my previous comment as well.

I am not familiar with the Bible, but I do not recall anything about sex with God = defile.

Oh. I guess your question was asking for a summation of my comments thus far and not for the point/purpose of my comments. I guess unclear questions would cause confusion...

Or maybe the ultimate form of intimacy.

In the end, it is still a form of love. If humans are suppose to love God, what is wrong with that form of love?

From what I understand, sexual relations between consenting adults is the ultimate (?) form of love.

jolie: What America needs is child control.

I think he is just an extreme narcissist. He creates all men in his image and loves them all unconditionally.

Guess someone here does not want to earn their badge for note-taking.

Nah. Pedophilia is a defined relationship between humans. God can't be a pedophile if he can't age.

God's plan involves taking his children to Heaven to dwell in Heaven forever. Sexual relation with God is something that completely defiles his nature. God's nature doesn't change as he is most pure.

What is wrong with sexual relations?

The Bible allows for sexual relations between man and woman. Man was created in the image of God, wouldn't sexual relations be a good way for a woman to become intimate with God?

Which GW study? There have been many.

I have personally only reviewed a few, not familiar with most.

Or is Halloween just a holiday for people who can't appreciate Comic-con?

Both sides have agendas. Scientific conclusions should be evaluated without agendas which is what I am doing regarding this sunspot study.

Being stupid leads to mistakes. This is the implied relationship.

You are right. I cannot prove that there is value in most interactions. I am making the claim based on my assumptions.

Technically, the study by Zharkova makes no mention of ice ages. It was just a study on sunspots.

The climate part was added on by people with agendas.

The fact that the sun can change the climate does not mean that man cannot change the climate.

In fact, the sun's significant influence on the climate is agreed upon by both sides.

The controversy is regarding man's influence on the climate.

Why would China's position be so drastically different from India's? Both are playing catch up. India is just more behind because of poor economic policies.

Racist.

Not realizing a mistake was stupid does not negate the entire experience. There is value in most interactions.

That can be true for anyone. Still does not negate the more experience claim.

What better way to learn than by making stupid mistakes?

They also have more life experience than the other children. It will be like an abusive (word choice: corporal/disciplinary?) BBBS.

They are probably kinky as fuck after the shawls come off.

I am suggesting that both men committed the alleged crimes.

There are still people that believe OJ is innocent, just like there will be people that will believe Cosby is innocent.

Fixed it.

Neutron bombs in real life tend to destroy buildings as well as annihilate life. They can also leave certain materials radioactive.

Basically, you destroy everything within 1 km and kill off all (most) life within 2 km.

It depends on if you believe OJ killed his wife.

http://www.tv.com/shows/elementary/community/post/elementary-review-absconded-1431122491/

Fake111!

Nope.

It would be more likely that the labor would live on the factory island. The time it would take to move around would delay production quite a bit.

Ok.

This did not sound like a bot.

Why are the rest of your responses so non-specific?

We should probably wait for Greece to go bankrupt on its own. There is no reason to provide debt relief to a country that refuses to enact domestic debt relief.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day

You could establish the procession of time with a telescope.

What the first person picked as a time unit was entirely up to him/her.

I think globalization will overcome these forces.

That is obviously Kanaloa.

Be gone! You Pekana!

Astronomy.

I would use it to keep going back 1 minute at a time until I I killed the inventor (creating a paradox), and then proceed to rule the world, one minute at a time.

PS: Did not watch the video, so if this uses some specific limitation like a time anchor, then my plan would not work.

What is an elite scientist?