I told you before, I don't live in America, and I am not a supporter of the American Democratic party. I would likely vote for an Independent. I also told you numerous times I do not support no restriction abortions.
Read what I said. "Nobody I have ever met agrees with abortion in all circumstances, nor with murder". That statement is completely true.
Are you actually able to read and comprehend?
What a moronic debate. You believe in fairy tales about an invisible man in the sky and you want to try to paint people who agree with abortion in certain circumstances as being short sighted.
NOBODY I have ever met agrees with abortion in all circumstances, nor with murder.
Say something meaningful, or shut up.
The time isn't coming Joe. It's been "nigh upon us" and the "end of days" for about 4,000 years now. I think it's time all you climate change denying scientifically illiterate cavemen woke up and faced the real world. Mary was an unfaithful cheat; Jesus was probably the son of a Roman soldier or some other fella who took Mary's fancy, and he spent his life being deluded into believing fairytales told to him by a woman who couldn't bear to be seen to be unfaithful; and your bible is a collection of petulant writing stitched together with less care than a cheap Chinese stuffed animal.
Religion is garbage.
Evolution is proven. Case closed.
I never said you care what other people do either. But quite clearly, you do care. Otherwise you wouldn't ramble incessantly on about how "unnatural" sticking your penis in an anus is.
Your God really is a pathetic fuckwit if that's what he has you spending time on, honestly.
Get a fuckn life.
Natural: this is a word which means "occurring in nature".
Nature: What exists: the physucal world.
Therefore, anything that occurs in the physical world is by definition: natural.
Homosexuality happens in nature. Therefore it is natural.
What you are trying to do is conflate the biological meaning of the word "natural", with the social/moral meaning. They are different. Homosexuality is biologically "natural". But by your reckoning it is not morally "natural".
But science deals in facts and realities. It doesn't concern itself with moral reasoning, which is by definition subjective. It concerns itself with physically manifested phenomena.
The scientific community continually changed their minds in the light of superior evidence. We proved the Earth was round and the scientific community adopted it. We proved that the Earth revolved around the sun, and the scientific community adopted it. and when the scientific community believed that life was created, Darwin proved that it was evolved, and guess what the scientific community did? That's right. Ten points. They adopted it.
We KNOW evolution happened.
Proof that Americans are bonafide psychopaths ^^ I'm glad the world hates you. Between your very public mistreatment of Iran, your withdrawal from the Paris agreement, your penchant for pissing of the Chinese and Russians at every turn, and your talent for alienating yourself from Europe in every possible capacity, it won't be long before you're a country of gun-toting, economically decimated, mentally retarded inbreds. At that point, we can seal you off at the borders in a gigantic impenetrable glass bubble and just forget about you until you disappear.
If you create something, with complete knowledge of its functions, and complete knowledge of every time, instance, and way in which it will utilize those functions, and which aims drive its acts, and all aspects of its life, from beginning, to end, then you are responsible for everything that it does. You have set the limitations on what it can and can't do, can and can't think, can and can't be. You have complete and total foresight of everything it will amount to, of every decision it will ever make, and in which direction those decisions will sway.
To create such a being, then blame it for being the way you knew it would be, the way you made it, the way you foresaw it, is an act of downright stupidity.
But more to the point: all of this is moot. There's no evidence of any of your religious tripe, anyway. God is a myth. And you are an idiot.
This is oxymoronic. "God knows everything and sees everything and exists in everything and is throughout all time and space, and whatever he decides to create he knows all the outcomes of every part of it before he creates it, which means he knows what every human will be like and what decisions they make before they even make them, but we have "free will"".
Take your head out of your ass.
A list of languages with no gender for inanimate objects:
Ainu
Afrikaans
Armenian (Indo-European)
Azerbaijani (Turkic)
Bashkir (Turkic)
Bengali (Indo-European)
Burmese
Carolinian (Austronesian)
Chamoru (Austronesian)
Chinese
Chuvash (Turkic)
Crimean Tatar (Turkic)
English (Indo-European)
Estonian (Uralic)
Esperanto (Constructed)
Fijian (Austronesian)
Finnish (Uralic)
Gagauz (Turkic)
Georgian
Gilbertese (Austronesian)
Greenlandic
Haitian Creole
Hungarian (Uralic)
Ido (Constructed)
Ilokano (Austronesian)
Japanese
Javanese (Austronesian)
Karachay-Balkar (Turkic)
Karakalpak (Turkic)
Kazakh (Turkic)
Korean
Khakas (Turkic)
Konkani (Indo-European)
Khmer
Kumyk (Turkic)
Kyrgyz (Turkic)
Lao
Lojban (Constructed)
Malagasy (Austronesian)
Malay/Indonesian (Austronesian)
Maori (Austronesian)
Marshallese (Austronesian)
Mongolian
Nahuatl (Uto-Aztecan)
Nauruan (Austronesian)
Niuean (Austronesian)
Nogai (Turkic)
Palauan (Austronesian)
Persian (Indo-European)
Rapa Nui (Austronesian)
Salar (Turkic)
Samoan (Austronesian)
Shor (Turkic)
Southern Quechua
Sundanese (Austronesian)
Tagalog (Austronesian)
Tahitian (Austronesian)
Tajik
Tatar (Turkic)
Tetum (Austronesian)
Thai
Tongan (Austronesian)
Turkish (Turkic)
Turkmen (Turkic)
Tuvaluan (Austronesian)
Tuvinian (Turkic)
Uyghur (Turkic)
Uzbek (Turkic)
Vietnamese
Visayan (Austronesian)
Yakut (Turkic)
Moron.
Equity is fairness, impartiality. Thus, equity is not the same as equality.
Giving Mr Jones who owns three million-dollar companies, welfare payments of £30 a month, and giving James Bonham who works down the mines for £3 a week, welfare payments of also £30 a month: that is equality. Equity is to give to Mr Bonham a fair wage and better welfare, and to recognize that Mr Jones is rich enough he doesn't need welfare payments at all.
Now I understand why you feel the need to aggressively assert the superiority of your intellect all the time, Antrim.
Laughable.
I defer to the brilliant Steven Hawking on this one:
"What we normally think of as 'life' is based on chains of carbon atoms, with a few other atoms, such as nitrogen or phosphorous. One can speculate that one might have life with some other chemical basis, such as silicon, but carbon seems the most favourable case, because it has the richest chemistry. That carbon atoms should exist at all, with the properties that they have, requires a fine adjustment of physical constants, such as the QCD scale, the electric charge, and even the dimension of space-time. If these constants had significantly different values, either the nucleus of the carbon atom would not be stable, or the electrons would collapse in on the nucleus. At first sight, it seems remarkable that the universe is so finely tuned. Maybe this is evidence, that the universe was specially designed to produce the human race. However, one has to be careful about such arguments, because of what is known as the Anthropic Principle. This is based on the self-evident truth, that if the universe had not been suitable for life, we wouldn't be asking why it is so finely adjusted."
In otherwords, biochemistry naturally produces complex results, and asking "what if it didn't" is stupid. It's like asking "what if nothing was like it is?": the conclusions to which can literally be ANYTHING, which is why the theological argument from fine-tuning is total bogus.
How little sense it makes: "God must exist, because the universe is the way that it is, not some other hypothetical way that it isn't and can't be".
Drivel.
You are a laughable individual. Democratic, majority atheist societies are safer, cleaner, and better educated than religious ones.
Religion demands you to carry out black and white instructions out of fear of burning for eternity. Without religion, you say morality is completey meaningless. Thus, without religion, you would behave without morals. But speak for yourself!
Not everybody is as mentally bankrupt as you!