You're saying that recorded images on a disk have free will? Are you mad?

Did you create the movie? Do its characters have free will? Is a film analogous to human life?

What point are you trying to make here?

Stupidity.

This is oxymoronic. "God knows everything and sees everything and exists in everything and is throughout all time and space, and whatever he decides to create he knows all the outcomes of every part of it before he creates it, which means he knows what every human will be like and what decisions they make before they even make them, but we have "free will"".

Take your head out of your ass.

A list of languages with no gender for inanimate objects:

Ainu

Afrikaans

Armenian (Indo-European)

Azerbaijani (Turkic)

Bashkir (Turkic)

Bengali (Indo-European)

Burmese

Carolinian (Austronesian)

Chamoru (Austronesian)

Chinese

Chuvash (Turkic)

Crimean Tatar (Turkic)

English (Indo-European)

Estonian (Uralic)

Esperanto (Constructed)

Fijian (Austronesian)

Finnish (Uralic)

Gagauz (Turkic)

Georgian

Gilbertese (Austronesian)

Greenlandic

Haitian Creole

Hungarian (Uralic)

Ido (Constructed)

Ilokano (Austronesian)

Japanese

Javanese (Austronesian)

Karachay-Balkar (Turkic)

Karakalpak (Turkic)

Kazakh (Turkic)

Korean

Khakas (Turkic)

Konkani (Indo-European)

Khmer

Kumyk (Turkic)

Kyrgyz (Turkic)

Lao

Lojban (Constructed)

Malagasy (Austronesian)

Malay/Indonesian (Austronesian)

Maori (Austronesian)

Marshallese (Austronesian)

Mongolian

Nahuatl (Uto-Aztecan)

Nauruan (Austronesian)

Niuean (Austronesian)

Nogai (Turkic)

Palauan (Austronesian)

Persian (Indo-European)

Rapa Nui (Austronesian)

Salar (Turkic)

Samoan (Austronesian)

Shor (Turkic)

Southern Quechua

Sundanese (Austronesian)

Tagalog (Austronesian)

Tahitian (Austronesian)

Tajik

Tatar (Turkic)

Tetum (Austronesian)

Thai

Tongan (Austronesian)

Turkish (Turkic)

Turkmen (Turkic)

Tuvaluan (Austronesian)

Tuvinian (Turkic)

Uyghur (Turkic)

Uzbek (Turkic)

Vietnamese

Visayan (Austronesian)

Yakut (Turkic)

Moron.

Equity is fairness, impartiality. Thus, equity is not the same as equality.

Giving Mr Jones who owns three million-dollar companies, welfare payments of £30 a month, and giving James Bonham who works down the mines for £3 a week, welfare payments of also £30 a month: that is equality. Equity is to give to Mr Bonham a fair wage and better welfare, and to recognize that Mr Jones is rich enough he doesn't need welfare payments at all.

Equity is not the same thing as equality. Try again trollface.

I have more important things to worry about than getting one up on religious people.

Pascal's wager is pathetic.

The death penalty is more expensive per prisoner than prison is.

In the same way that Stalinism calls itself communism, modern day misandry calls itself "feminism".

Neither lives up to the definition it tries to apply to itself.

What you're saying is you have no counterargument. Ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem.

What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

Now I understand why you feel the need to aggressively assert the superiority of your intellect all the time, Antrim.

Laughable.

I defer to the brilliant Steven Hawking on this one:

"What we normally think of as 'life' is based on chains of carbon atoms, with a few other atoms, such as nitrogen or phosphorous. One can speculate that one might have life with some other chemical basis, such as silicon, but carbon seems the most favourable case, because it has the richest chemistry. That carbon atoms should exist at all, with the properties that they have, requires a fine adjustment of physical constants, such as the QCD scale, the electric charge, and even the dimension of space-time. If these constants had significantly different values, either the nucleus of the carbon atom would not be stable, or the electrons would collapse in on the nucleus. At first sight, it seems remarkable that the universe is so finely tuned. Maybe this is evidence, that the universe was specially designed to produce the human race. However, one has to be careful about such arguments, because of what is known as the Anthropic Principle. This is based on the self-evident truth, that if the universe had not been suitable for life, we wouldn't be asking why it is so finely adjusted."

In otherwords, biochemistry naturally produces complex results, and asking "what if it didn't" is stupid. It's like asking "what if nothing was like it is?": the conclusions to which can literally be ANYTHING, which is why the theological argument from fine-tuning is total bogus.

How little sense it makes: "God must exist, because the universe is the way that it is, not some other hypothetical way that it isn't and can't be".

Drivel.

You are a laughable individual. Democratic, majority atheist societies are safer, cleaner, and better educated than religious ones.

Religion demands you to carry out black and white instructions out of fear of burning for eternity. Without religion, you say morality is completey meaningless. Thus, without religion, you would behave without morals. But speak for yourself!

Not everybody is as mentally bankrupt as you!