The leader of every terrorist/freedom fighter lives better than those he's fighting for.
Can you name one leader who does Not live better than the general public?
It just makes me wonder if they are doing it for the general public or if they're doing it for themselves.
YEAH, why is that?
Side Score: 4
|
 |
Wait..., what? No!!!
Side Score: 2
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
1
point
1
point
They are living better lives than those who do the fighting, but those who do the fighting are either dying, or living in trenches and barracks, not a great upgrade needs to be made to live a better life than that. As for why they are not living an equally horrible life (out their on the field) is because they are the leaders. They are valued higher, and must be kept safer, and less stressed to make the battle decisions for those with the physical ability to carry out. Side: YEAH, why is that?
1
point
Think about Castro and other communist leaders who claimed they were doing it for the working family. They live better than "The working family" whose life they fought to improve. Did the working Cuban family's life improve or was it only Castro's life that got better? ;) Side: YEAH, why is that?
Well if you're choosing a leader whom we know is corrupt and in it for luxury, then you'll be seeing this debate very one sided. As the question asks," is the leader of every terrorist/freedom fighter yadda yadda" with the option I proposed the answer is, not really. Side: YEAH, why is that?
|
1
point
|
