Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 1 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
How did that single-cell come about via "chemical processes" if there were no chemicals to conduct the appropriate process to yield this mystical single cell that we all emanated from?
Just for arguendo, let's say you are correct about your single-cell. When and how did that cell acquire intelligence? Emotion? Memory?
Evolutionists believe that in the beginning there was nothing. Then, (without knowledge of where the energy for an explosion came from), something (even though there was nothing) exploded and then there was everything. The evolutionist viewpoint is religion as well.
The thoughts we have in our head can only be measured quantitatively not qualitatively to the absolute so, prove to us, supporters of intelligent design, that despite your utter dependence upon 'chance', we as humans can be sure that tomorrow everything we know to be true as of right now will be true tomorrow? After all, pursuant to your worldview, there are no absolutes. There are countless gaps in the atheistic perspective, and if you're willing to step back and objectively evaluate it, you'll find that not only do atheists contradict themselves everytime they question concepts and ideas(non-matter nouns), but also when they try to be good to one another without any believing in any absolute morals.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |