Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day



Welcome to Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day!

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS DEL681651

Reward Points:70
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
90%
Arguments:51
Debates:1
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
5 most recent arguments.
1 point

How can one measure "Stupid"? Are criminals stupid? Do we use an extremely flawed measure such as IQ?

Ignoring that, intelligence isn't a particularly inheritable trait. The problem isn't just stupid people having kids, it's stupid people /raising/ kids. We don't know nearly enough about genetics to determine what actually constitutes "good genes" that we want to pass on.

1 point

Uh, what?

3 and 5 show causation. This is backed up by correlation, not the other way around.

You still never stated what of the 8 points you disagreed with.

3 points

The evidence for global warming is in the first 8 points. It defends global warming throughout the rest of the article. You tagged your article as "Nope, never did", so could you explain which of those 8 points you disagree with?

I don't understand how you found that article "borderline dangerous". That sounds awfully hyperbolic to me.

3 points

Why on earth would I read an article from the 1970s about a modern scientific problem? Yeah, scientists are wrong sometimes. This was also never, to my knowledge, a "consensus" which was acted upon like global warming is. It's not a "scam".

1 point

I reject your notion that spending billions abroad is beneficial, as well as your notion that we should screw other countries.

Let's take, for example, our "selfless rebuilding efforts" in Iraq. We spend billions there and we kill more civilians than Saddam did. A strong majority of Iraqi citizens wanted us to go away.

But we can't "screw other countries." A citizen of China, Zimbabwe or Iraq is -no less important- than a citizen of the US. However our aid should not be in rogue efforts. We need to stop ignoring the UN and pay our debts to them, taking a more active role in supporting their policies and not vetoing resolutions on human rights that "violate our sovereignty" as Dr. PAul puts it.

DEL681651 has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here